SHENANDOAH VALLEY BROADCASTING v. AM. SOC. OF COMPOSERS, 371 U.S. 540 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SHENANDOAH VALLEY BROADCASTING v. AM. SOC. OF COMPOSERS, 371 U.S. 540 (1963) 371 U.S. 540SHENANDOAH VALLEY BROADCASTING, INC.,
ET AL. v.
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 592.
Decided January 14, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Reported below: 208 F. Supp. 896.
Ralstone R. Irvine and Walter R. Mansfield for appellants.
Arthur H. Dean, William Piel, Jr., Herman Finkelstein and Lloyd N. Cutler for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 592.
Decided January 14, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Reported below: 208 F. Supp. 896. Ralstone R. Irvine and Walter R. Mansfield for appellants. Arthur H. Dean, William Piel, Jr., Herman Finkelstein and Lloyd N. Cutler for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 371 U.S. 540, 541
U.S. Supreme Court
SHENANDOAH VALLEY BROADCASTING v. AM. SOC. OF COMPOSERS, 371 U.S. 540 (1963) 371 U.S. 540 SHENANDOAH VALLEY BROADCASTING, INC., ET AL. v.AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 592.
Decided January 14, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Reported below: 208 F. Supp. 896. Ralstone R. Irvine and Walter R. Mansfield for appellants. Arthur H. Dean, William Piel, Jr., Herman Finkelstein and Lloyd N. Cutler for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 371 U.S. 540, 541
Search This Case
