BUSBY v. HARRIS, 370 U.S. 48 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
BUSBY v. HARRIS, 370 U.S. 48 (1962) 370 U.S. 48BUSBY ET AL. v. HARRIS, JUDGE, ET
AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 728, Misc.
Decided May 28, 1962.
Certiorari granted; judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot.
Petitioners pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Upon the Solicitor General's suggestion of mootness and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that the case is moot.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
BUSBY v. HARRIS, 370 U.S. 48 (1962) 370 U.S. 48 BUSBY ET AL. v. HARRIS, JUDGE, ET AL.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 728, Misc.
Decided May 28, 1962.
Certiorari granted; judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot. Petitioners pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein for respondents. PER CURIAM. Upon the Solicitor General's suggestion of mootness and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that the case is moot. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 370 U.S. 48, 49
