MILUTIN v. BOUCHARD, 370 U.S. 292 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
MILUTIN v. BOUCHARD, 370 U.S. 292 (1962) 370 U.S. 292MILUTIN v. BOUCHARD, DISTRICT DIRECTOR,
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 782.
Decided June 18, 1962.
Certiorari granted; judgment of the Court of Appeals vacated; case remanded to the District Court with instructions.
Reported below: 299 F.2d 50.
Alfred W. Charles for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey with instructions to remand it to the Immigration and Naturalization Service with directions to reopen the proceeding and to afford petitioner an opportunity to seek relief under 243 (h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 pursuant to the procedures established by the currently applicable regulations as suggested by the Solicitor General.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILUTIN v. BOUCHARD, 370 U.S. 292 (1962) 370 U.S. 292 MILUTIN v. BOUCHARD, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATIONSERVICE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 782.
Decided June 18, 1962.
Certiorari granted; judgment of the Court of Appeals vacated; case remanded to the District Court with instructions. Reported below: 299 F.2d 50. Alfred W. Charles for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey with instructions to remand it to the Immigration and Naturalization Service with directions to reopen the proceeding and to afford petitioner an opportunity to seek relief under 243 (h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 pursuant to the procedures established by the currently applicable regulations as suggested by the Solicitor General. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 370 U.S. 292, 293
