SHUBIN v. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT, THE S. DIST. OF CA, 369 U.S. 660 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SHUBIN v. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT, THE S. DIST. OF CA, 369 U.S. 660 (1962)

369 U.S. 660

SHUBIN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 726.
Decided May 14, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Dairy Queen, Inc., v. Wood, ante, p. 469.

Reported below: 299 F.2d 47.

William Douglas Sellers for petitioners.

Robert W. Fulwider for S. Vincen Bowles, Inc., respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Dairy Queen, Inc., v. Wood, ante, p. 469.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 660, 661




U.S. Supreme Court

SHUBIN v. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT, THE S. DIST. OF CA, 369 U.S. 660 (1962)

369 U.S. 660

SHUBIN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 726.
Decided May 14, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Dairy Queen, Inc., v. Wood, ante, p. 469.

Reported below: 299 F.2d 47.

William Douglas Sellers for petitioners.

Robert W. Fulwider for S. Vincen Bowles, Inc., respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Dairy Queen, Inc., v. Wood, ante, p. 469.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 660, 661

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.