MANAGED FUNDS, INC. v. BROUK, 369 U.S. 424 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

MANAGED FUNDS, INC. v. BROUK, 369 U.S. 424 (1962)

369 U.S. 424

MANAGED FUNDS, INC., v. BROUK ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 87.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss cause of action as to respondents.

Reported below: 286 F.2d 901.

R. Walston Chubb for petitioner.

Forrest M. Hemker for Brouk et al. and William Stix for Baker et al., respondents.

Solicitor General Cox, Daniel M. Friedman, Allan F. Conwill and Walter P. North for the Securities and Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness and the joint motion of counsel to vacate and remand, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause of action as to the respondents.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 424, 425




U.S. Supreme Court

MANAGED FUNDS, INC. v. BROUK, 369 U.S. 424 (1962)

369 U.S. 424

MANAGED FUNDS, INC., v. BROUK ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 87.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss cause of action as to respondents.

Reported below: 286 F.2d 901.

R. Walston Chubb for petitioner.

Forrest M. Hemker for Brouk et al. and William Stix for Baker et al., respondents.

Solicitor General Cox, Daniel M. Friedman, Allan F. Conwill and Walter P. North for the Securities and Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness and the joint motion of counsel to vacate and remand, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause of action as to the respondents.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 424, 425

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.