HARVEY v. SMYTH, 369 U.S. 152 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

HARVEY v. SMYTH, 369 U.S. 152 (1962)

369 U.S. 152

HARVEY, ALIAS McCARGO, v. SMYTH, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 7, Misc.
Decided March 19, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to substitute W. K. Cunningham, Jr., in the place of W. Frank Smyth, Jr., as the party respondent is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are also granted. The judgment is reversed. Chewning v. Cunningham, 368 U.S. 443.

MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 152, 153




U.S. Supreme Court

HARVEY v. SMYTH, 369 U.S. 152 (1962)

369 U.S. 152

HARVEY, ALIAS McCARGO, v. SMYTH, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 7, Misc.
Decided March 19, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to substitute W. K. Cunningham, Jr., in the place of W. Frank Smyth, Jr., as the party respondent is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are also granted. The judgment is reversed. Chewning v. Cunningham, 368 U.S. 443.

MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 152, 153

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.