ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. MONAGHAN, 368 U.S. 12 (1961)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. MONAGHAN, 368 U.S. 12 (1961) 368 U.S. 12ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC., v. MONAGHAN,
COMMISSIONER OF HARNESS RACING.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 299.
Decided October 16, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 9 N.Y.2d 293, 174 N.E.2d 71.
Samuel I. Rosenman, George Morton Levy and Max Freund for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 299.
Decided October 16, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 9 N.Y.2d 293, 174 N.E.2d 71. Samuel I. Rosenman, George Morton Levy and Max Freund for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction. Page 368 U.S. 12, 13
U.S. Supreme Court
ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. MONAGHAN, 368 U.S. 12 (1961) 368 U.S. 12 ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC., v. MONAGHAN, COMMISSIONER OF HARNESS RACING.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 299.
Decided October 16, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 9 N.Y.2d 293, 174 N.E.2d 71. Samuel I. Rosenman, George Morton Levy and Max Freund for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction. Page 368 U.S. 12, 13
Search This Case
