HERRON v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 715 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
HERRON v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 715 (1961) 366 U.S. 715HERRON v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
OREGON.
No. 791.
Decided May 29, 1961.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
366 U.S. 715 (1961) 366 U.S. 715 (1961) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLEKAMP v. HOLEKAMP LUMBER CO., 366 U.S. 715 (1961) 366 U.S. 715HOLEKAMP ET AL. v. HOLEKAMP LUMBER CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 870.
Decided May 29, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 340 S.W.2d 678.
Donald E. Fahey for appellants.
Eugene H. Buder for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
HERRON v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 715 (1961) 366 U.S. 715 HERRON v. UNITED STATES.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 791.
Decided May 29, 1961.
Appeal dismissed. Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___. Appellant pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
366 U.S. 715 (1961) 366 U.S. 715 (1961) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLEKAMP v. HOLEKAMP LUMBER CO., 366 U.S. 715 (1961) 366 U.S. 715 HOLEKAMP ET AL. v. HOLEKAMP LUMBER CO. ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 870.
Decided May 29, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 340 S.W.2d 678. Donald E. Fahey for appellants. Eugene H. Buder for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 366 U.S. 715, 716