UTAH CITIZENS RATE ASSN. v. U.S., 365 U.S. 649 (1961)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
UTAH CITIZENS RATE ASSN. v. U.S., 365 U.S. 649 (1961) 365 U.S. 649UTAH CITIZENS RATE ASSOCIATION ET AL.
v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
UTAH.
No. 712.
Decided April 3, 1961.
192 F. Supp. 12, affirmed.
Calvin L. Rampton for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and A. U. Miner, L. W. Hobbs, Bryan P. Leverich and Ernest P. Porter for the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH.
No. 712.
Decided April 3, 1961.
192 F. Supp. 12, affirmed. Calvin L. Rampton for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and A. U. Miner, L. W. Hobbs, Bryan P. Leverich and Ernest P. Porter for the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 365 U.S. 649, 650
U.S. Supreme Court
UTAH CITIZENS RATE ASSN. v. U.S., 365 U.S. 649 (1961) 365 U.S. 649 UTAH CITIZENS RATE ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH.
No. 712.
Decided April 3, 1961.
192 F. Supp. 12, affirmed. Calvin L. Rampton for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and A. U. Miner, L. W. Hobbs, Bryan P. Leverich and Ernest P. Porter for the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 365 U.S. 649, 650
Search This Case
