DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 505 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 505 (1960) 364 U.S. 505DAVIS v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 456.
Decided December 12, 1960.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed as to Counts I, II and III of the indictment, and case remanded for new trial on said counts.
Reported below: 281 F.2d 93.
George F. Callaghan and Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the entire record and the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment concerned with Counts I, II, and III of the indictment, and that part of the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial on Counts I, II, and III. In all other respects the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 505 (1960) 364 U.S. 505 DAVIS v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 456.
Decided December 12, 1960.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed as to Counts I, II and III of the indictment, and case remanded for new trial on said counts. Reported below: 281 F.2d 93. George F. Callaghan and Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States. PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the entire record and the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment concerned with Counts I, II, and III of the indictment, and that part of the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial on Counts I, II, and III. In all other respects the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Page 364 U.S. 505, 506
