EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 282 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 282 (1960) 364 U.S. 282EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 119, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded.
Reported below: 266 F.2d 88.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 206, decided this day.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in Rios v. United States, ante, p. 233, and Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 233, decided this day.
U.S. Supreme Court
EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 282 (1960) 364 U.S. 282 EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 119, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded. Reported below: 266 F.2d 88. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 206, decided this day. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in Rios v. United States, ante, p. 233, and Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 233, decided this day. Page 364 U.S. 282, 283
