McGANN v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 309 (1960)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
McGANN v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 309 (1960) 362 U.S. 309McGANN v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 488, Misc.
Decided March 28, 1960.
Certiorari granted: judgment vacated: and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General that inasmuch as the petitioner had been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis by the District Court, the application to the Court of Appeals was unnecessary, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 488, Misc.
Decided March 28, 1960.
Certiorari granted: judgment vacated: and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General that inasmuch as the petitioner had been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis by the District Court, the application to the Court of Appeals was unnecessary, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings. Page 362 U.S. 309, 310
U.S. Supreme Court
McGANN v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 309 (1960) 362 U.S. 309 McGANN v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 488, Misc.
Decided March 28, 1960.
Certiorari granted: judgment vacated: and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General that inasmuch as the petitioner had been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis by the District Court, the application to the Court of Appeals was unnecessary, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings. Page 362 U.S. 309, 310
Search This Case
