UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS, 361 U.S. 116 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116 UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 24.
Decided November 23, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.
Reported below: 260 F.2d 884.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.
Norman J. Gundlach and John C. Roberts for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. United States v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., ante, p. 78.
U.S. Supreme Court
LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116 LaPORTE ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF NEW YORK.
No. 425.
Decided November 23, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 1, 159 N.E. 540.
Dante M. Scaccia for appellants.
Paxton Blair, Solicitor General of New York, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116 UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 24.
Decided November 23, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.
Reported below: 260 F.2d 884.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.
Norman J. Gundlach and John C. Roberts for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. United States v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., ante, p. 78.
U.S. Supreme Court
LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116 LaPORTE ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF NEW YORK.
No. 425.
Decided November 23, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 1, 159 N.E. 540.
Dante M. Scaccia for appellants.
Paxton Blair, Solicitor General of New York, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 361 U.S. 116, 117
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
