UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS, 361 U.S. 116 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116

UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 24.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 260 F.2d 884.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

Norman J. Gundlach and John C. Roberts for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. United States v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., ante, p. 78.

LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/361/116/">361 U.S. 116</a> (1959) 361 U.S. 116 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116

LaPORTE ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF NEW YORK.
No. 425.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 1, 159 N.E. 540.

Dante M. Scaccia for appellants.

Paxton Blair, Solicitor General of New York, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 116, 117

 


U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116

UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 24.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 260 F.2d 884.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

Norman J. Gundlach and John C. Roberts for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. United States v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., ante, p. 78.

LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/361/116/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/361/116/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/361/116/">361 U.S. 116</a></a></a> (1959) 361 U.S. 116 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116

LaPORTE ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF NEW YORK.
No. 425.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 1, 159 N.E. 540.

Dante M. Scaccia for appellants.

Paxton Blair, Solicitor General of New York, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 116, 117

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.