GANGER v. CITY OF MIAMI, 359 U.S. 64 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

GANGER v. CITY OF MIAMI, 359 U.S. 64 (1959)

359 U.S. 64

GANGER ET AL. v. CITY OF MIAMI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 153.
Argued March 2-3, 1959.
Decided March 9, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Reported below: 101 So.2d 116, 123.

Thomas H. Anderson and Herbert L. Nadeau argued the cause for appellants. With them on the brief was Clyde Epperson.

Milton M. Ferrell argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.


TOWNSEND v. SAIN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/359/64/case.html">359 U.S. 64</a> (1959) 359 U.S. 64 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TOWNSEND v. SAIN, 359 U.S. 64 (1959)

359 U.S. 64

TOWNSEND v. SAIN, SHERIFF, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 552, Misc.
Decided March 9, 1959.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

George N. Leighton and William R. Ming, Jr. for appellant.

Benjamin S. Adamowski for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded. United States ex rel. Jennings v. Ragen, Warden, 358 U.S. 276.

Page 359 U.S. 64, 65




U.S. Supreme Court

GANGER v. CITY OF MIAMI, 359 U.S. 64 (1959)

359 U.S. 64

GANGER ET AL. v. CITY OF MIAMI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 153.
Argued March 2-3, 1959.
Decided March 9, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Reported below: 101 So.2d 116, 123.

Thomas H. Anderson and Herbert L. Nadeau argued the cause for appellants. With them on the brief was Clyde Epperson.

Milton M. Ferrell argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.


TOWNSEND v. SAIN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/359/64/case.html">359 U.S. 64</a> (1959) 359 U.S. 64 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TOWNSEND v. SAIN, 359 U.S. 64 (1959)

359 U.S. 64

TOWNSEND v. SAIN, SHERIFF, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 552, Misc.
Decided March 9, 1959.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

George N. Leighton and William R. Ming, Jr. for appellant.

Benjamin S. Adamowski for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded. United States ex rel. Jennings v. Ragen, Warden, 358 U.S. 276.

Page 359 U.S. 64, 65

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.