LEV v. U S, 358 U.S. 903 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
LEV v. U S , 358 U.S. 903 (1958)358 U.S. 903
Harry LEV, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 435.
Raymond WOOL, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 436.
Marvin RUBIN, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 437.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 8, 1958 [ Lev v. U S 358 U.S. 903 (1958) ][903-continued.]
In No. 435 petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to questions 5, 6, and 7 presented by the petition for the writ which read as follows:
summary in order to determine whether the summary is discoverable under the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 3500, when no claim is made that it contained irrelevant or extraneous matter?
In No. 436 petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to question 2 presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:
In No. 437 petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
The cases are consolidated and a total of three hours allowed for oral argument.
Mr. Justice STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Mr. Anthony Bradley Eben, for petitioner Lev.
Mr. Albert H. Treiman, for petitioner Wool.
Mr. Isidor Enselman, for petitioner Rubin.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General
Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper, for the United
States.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEV v. U S , 358 U.S. 903 (1958) 358 U.S. 903 Harry LEV, petitioner,v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 435. Raymond WOOL, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 436. Marvin RUBIN, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 437. Supreme Court of the United States December 8, 1958 [ Lev v. U S 358 U.S. 903 (1958) ][903-continued.] In No. 435 petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to questions 5, 6, and 7 presented by the petition for the writ which read as follows:
Page 358 U.S. 903 , 904 summary in order to determine whether the summary is discoverable under the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 3500, when no claim is made that it contained irrelevant or extraneous matter?