CHAFFIN v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
CHAFFIN v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959) 358 U.S. 642CHAFFIN ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. No. 549.
Decided February 24, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Morris Lavine for appellants.
Aaron W. Reese for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
358 U.S. 642 (1959) 358 U.S. 642 (1959) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959) 358 U.S. 642ANDERSON v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 576.
Decided February 24, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 327 P.2d 699.
Luther Bohanon and Leon S. Hirsh for appellant.
Ferrill Rogers, T. Murray Robinson and C. E. Barnes for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
CHAFFIN v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959) 358 U.S. 642 CHAFFIN ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. No. 549.
Decided February 24, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Morris Lavine for appellants. Aaron W. Reese for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
358 U.S. 642 (1959) 358 U.S. 642 (1959) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959) 358 U.S. 642 ANDERSON v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 576.
Decided February 24, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 327 P.2d 699. Luther Bohanon and Leon S. Hirsh for appellant. Ferrill Rogers, T. Murray Robinson and C. E. Barnes for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 358 U.S. 642, 643