FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN v. BOWERS, 358 U.S. 305 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN v. BOWERS, 358 U.S. 305 (1959) 358 U.S. 305SECOND FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND v. BOWERS,
TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 537.
Decided January 19, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 168 Ohio St. 65, 151 N.E.2d 223.
Robert G. Day for appellant.
William Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and John M. Tobin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 537.
Decided January 19, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 168 Ohio St. 65, 151 N.E.2d 223. Robert G. Day for appellant. William Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and John M. Tobin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 358 U.S. 305, 306
U.S. Supreme Court
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN v. BOWERS, 358 U.S. 305 (1959) 358 U.S. 305 SECOND FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND v. BOWERS,TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 537.
Decided January 19, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 168 Ohio St. 65, 151 N.E.2d 223. Robert G. Day for appellant. William Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and John M. Tobin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 358 U.S. 305, 306
Search This Case
