CASH v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 219 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
CASH v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 219 (1958) 357 U.S. 219CASH v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 723, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1958.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and cause remanded for consideration in light of cases cited.
Reported below: ___ U.S. App. D.C. ___, 261 F.2d 731.
Eugene Gressman for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, decided May 26, 1958, and in light of Hill v. United States, 356 U.S. 704, decided June 2, 1958.
U.S. Supreme Court
CASH v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 219 (1958) 357 U.S. 219 CASH v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 723, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1958.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and cause remanded for consideration in light of cases cited. Reported below: ___ U.S. App. D.C. ___, 261 F.2d 731. Eugene Gressman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, decided May 26, 1958, and in light of Hill v. United States, 356 U.S. 704, decided June 2, 1958. Page 357 U.S. 219, 220