RATNER v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 368 (1958)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
RATNER v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 368 (1958) 356 U.S. 368RATNER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 819.
Decided May 5, 1958.
162 F. Supp. 518, affirmed.
David Axelrod and James L. Givan for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Walter Harwood for the Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 819.
Decided May 5, 1958.
162 F. Supp. 518, affirmed. David Axelrod and James L. Givan for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Walter Harwood for the Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 356 U.S. 368, 369
U.S. Supreme Court
RATNER v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 368 (1958) 356 U.S. 368 RATNER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 819.
Decided May 5, 1958.
162 F. Supp. 518, affirmed. David Axelrod and James L. Givan for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Walter Harwood for the Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 356 U.S. 368, 369
Search This Case
