AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. v. KENOSHA, 356 U.S. 21 (1958)
Decided:
March 10, 1958
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. v. KENOSHA, 356 U.S. 21 (1958) 356 U.S. 21AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. ET AL. v. CITY OF
KENOSHA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 343.
Decided March 10, 1958.
274 Wis. 315, 80 N.W.2d 363, affirmed.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott and H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States, and Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation, appellants.
Wm. J. P. Abert and Robert V. Baker for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 343.
Decided March 10, 1958.
274 Wis. 315, 80 N.W.2d 363, affirmed. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott and H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States, and Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation, appellants. Wm. J. P. Abert and Robert V. Baker for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958. Page 356 U.S. 21, 22
U.S. Supreme Court
AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. v. KENOSHA, 356 U.S. 21 (1958) 356 U.S. 21 AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. ET AL. v. CITY OF KENOSHA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 343.
Decided March 10, 1958.
274 Wis. 315, 80 N.W.2d 363, affirmed. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott and H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States, and Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation, appellants. Wm. J. P. Abert and Robert V. Baker for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958. Page 356 U.S. 21, 22
Search This Case
