WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957) 355 U.S. 40

WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 438.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Judgment affirmed.

Monroe E. Stein and Richard F. Wolfson for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States, and Albert R. Connelly for the Miami Beach Theatre Corporation, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/40/case.html">355 U.S. 40</a> (1957) 355 U.S. 40 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, 355 U.S. 40 (1957) 355 U.S. 40

SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL
UNIT, v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 437.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 183 Pa. Super. 219, 130 A.2d 240.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 40, 41

 


U.S. Supreme Court

WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957) 355 U.S. 40

WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 438.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Judgment affirmed.

Monroe E. Stein and Richard F. Wolfson for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States, and Albert R. Connelly for the Miami Beach Theatre Corporation, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/40/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/355/40/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/355/40/">355 U.S. 40</a></a></a> (1957) 355 U.S. 40 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, 355 U.S. 40 (1957) 355 U.S. 40

SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL
UNIT, v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 437.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 183 Pa. Super. 219, 130 A.2d 240.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 40, 41

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.