WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court
WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)
355 U.S. 40 WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 438.
Decided November 12, 1957.
Judgment affirmed.
Monroe E. Stein and Richard F. Wolfson for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States, and Albert R. Connelly for the Miami Beach Theatre Corporation, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)
355 U.S. 40SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL
UNIT, v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 437.
Decided November 12, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 183 Pa. Super. 219, 130 A. 2d 240.
Hayden C. Covington for appellants.
Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)
355 U.S. 40 WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 438.
Decided November 12, 1957.
Judgment affirmed.
Monroe E. Stein and Richard F. Wolfson for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States, and Albert R. Connelly for the Miami Beach Theatre Corporation, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)
355 U.S. 40SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL
UNIT, v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 437.
Decided November 12, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 183 Pa. Super. 219, 130 A. 2d 240.
Hayden C. Covington for appellants.
Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
