TIMES FILM CORP. v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 355 U.S. 35 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

TIMES FILM CORP. v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 355 U.S. 35 (1957)

355 U.S. 35

TIMES FILM CORP. v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 372.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Alberts v. California, 354 U.S. 476.

 244 F.2d 432, reversed.

Felix J. Bilgrey for petitioner.

John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reversed. Alberts v. California, 354 U.S. 476.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON and MR. JUSTICE CLARK are of the opinion that the petition for certiorari should not have been granted.

Page 355 U.S. 35, 36

 


U.S. Supreme Court

TIMES FILM CORP. v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 355 U.S. 35 (1957)

355 U.S. 35

TIMES FILM CORP. v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 372.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Alberts v. California, 354 U.S. 476.

 244 F.2d 432, reversed.

Felix J. Bilgrey for petitioner.

John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reversed. Alberts v. California, 354 U.S. 476.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON and MR. JUSTICE CLARK are of the opinion that the petition for certiorari should not have been granted.

Page 355 U.S. 35, 36

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.