SOUTHERN R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 283 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTHERN R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 283 (1958)

355 U.S. 283

SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 558.
Decided January 6, 1958.

153 F. Supp. 57, affirmed.

Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon Henry J. Karison and R. Granville Curry for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and J. P. Fishwich, R. B. Gwathmey, James W. Hoeland, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan for the Harlan County Coal Operators Association et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 355 U.S. 283, 284

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTHERN R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 283 (1958)

355 U.S. 283

SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 558.
Decided January 6, 1958.

153 F. Supp. 57, affirmed.

Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon Henry J. Karison and R. Granville Curry for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and J. P. Fishwich, R. B. Gwathmey, James W. Hoeland, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan for the Harlan County Coal Operators Association et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 355 U.S. 283, 284

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.