United States v. McDaniel, 31 U.S. 634 (1832)

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. McDaniel, 31 U.S. 6 Pet. 634 634 (1832)

United States v. McDaniel

31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 634

Syllabus

The declaration was for a balance of accounts of $988.94, and the ad damnum was laid at $2,000. The bill of exceptions showed that the United States claimed interest on the balances due it. Under those circumstances, it is no objection to the jurisdiction that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the United States to a refusal of the court to grant an instruction asked by the United States which was applicable to certain items of credit only claimed by the defendants which would reduce the debt below the sum of $1,000. The Court cannot judicially know what influence that refusal had upon the, verdict.

A motion was made by Mr. Coxe, for the defendant, to dismiss this suit for want of jurisdiction, the sum in controversy at the trial being less than $1,000 and it appearing from the bill of exceptions that the only items in controversy on which the instruction excepted to was given by the circuit court were less than that sum.

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. McDaniel, 31 U.S. 6 Pet. 634 634 (1832)

United States v. McDaniel

31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 634

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR

THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Syllabus

The declaration was for a balance of accounts of $988.94, and the ad damnum was laid at $2,000. The bill of exceptions showed that the United States claimed interest on the balances due it. Under those circumstances, it is no objection to the jurisdiction that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the United States to a refusal of the court to grant an instruction asked by the United States which was applicable to certain items of credit only claimed by the defendants which would reduce the debt below the sum of $1,000. The Court cannot judicially know what influence that refusal had upon the, verdict.

A motion was made by Mr. Coxe, for the defendant, to dismiss this suit for want of jurisdiction, the sum in controversy at the trial being less than $1,000 and it appearing from the bill of exceptions that the only items in controversy on which the instruction excepted to was given by the circuit court were less than that sum.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court overruling the motion.

The declaration is for a balance of accounts of $988.94, and the ad damnum is laid at $2,000. The bill of exceptions shows that the United States claimed interest on the balance due to them. There is general verdict for the defendant. Under these circumstances, it is no objection to the jurisdiction that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the United States to a refusal of the circuit court to grant an instruction asked by the United States, which was applicable to certain items of credit only, claimed by the defendant, which would reduce the debt below the sum of $1,000. The court cannot judicially know that influence that refusal had upon the verdict.

The motion was overruled.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.