WASHBURN CROSBY CO. v. NEE, 296 U.S. 641 (1935)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
WASHBURN CROSBY CO. v. NEE, 296 U.S. 641 (1935)296 U.S. 641
WASHBURN CROSBY COMPANY,
petitioner,
v.
Dan M. LEE, Individually and as Collector, etc.*
No. 514.
Supreme Court of the United States
November 11, 1935
Mr. Charles B. Rugg, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
The Attorney General, for respondent.
No opinion filed in court below.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
* Rehearing denied 296 U.S. 664, 56 S. Ct. 307.[ Washburn Crosby
Co v. Nee 296 U.S.
641 (1935) ]
Opinions
v.
Dan M. LEE, Individually and as Collector, etc.*
No. 514.
Supreme Court of the United States November 11, 1935 Mr. Charles B. Rugg, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner. The Attorney General, for respondent. No opinion filed in court below. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. * Rehearing denied 296 U.S. 664, 56 S. Ct. 307.[ Washburn Crosby Co v. Nee 296 U.S. 641 (1935) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
WASHBURN CROSBY CO. v. NEE, 296 U.S. 641 (1935) 296 U.S. 641 WASHBURN CROSBY COMPANY, petitioner,v.
Dan M. LEE, Individually and as Collector, etc.*
No. 514.
Supreme Court of the United States November 11, 1935 Mr. Charles B. Rugg, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner. The Attorney General, for respondent. No opinion filed in court below. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. * Rehearing denied 296 U.S. 664, 56 S. Ct. 307.[ Washburn Crosby Co v. Nee 296 U.S. 641 (1935) ]
Search This Case
