DE FOREST RADIO COMPANY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 284 U.S. 571 (1931)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
DE FOREST RADIO COMPANY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 284 U.S. 571 (1931)284 U.S. 571
DE FOREST RADIO COMPANY,
petitioner,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
No. 630.
Supreme Court of the United States
October term, 1930
October 19, 1931
Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., for petitioner.
Mr. Ralph B. Evans, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Ordered, that the opinion in this case be amended as follows:
(1) By substituting for the words 'In July, 1912,' in the 12th line of the last paragraph of the opinion, the following:
'August 20, 1912, the earliest date
claimed for Langmuir, was rejected, rightly, we think, by the
District Court, which held that Langmuir was anticipated by Arnold
in November, 1912. But before the earlier date,'
(2) By substituting for the 3d sentence from the end of the following:
'By August, 1912, the Telegraph
Company used De Forest amplifying audions at 54 volts, and, by
November, they were used by another at 67 1/2 volts. This was
possible only because the tubes had thus been exhausted of gas
which would otherwise have ionized with blue glow at from 20 to 30
volts.'[ De Forest Radio Company v. General Electric Company
284 U.S. 571
(1931) ]
Opinions
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
No. 630.
Supreme Court of the United States October term, 1930 October 19, 1931 Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., for petitioner. Mr. Ralph B. Evans, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Ordered, that the opinion in this case be amended as follows: (1) By substituting for the words 'In July, 1912,' in the 12th line of the last paragraph of the opinion, the following:
U.S. Supreme Court
DE FOREST RADIO COMPANY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 284 U.S. 571 (1931) 284 U.S. 571 DE FOREST RADIO COMPANY, petitioner,v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
No. 630.
Supreme Court of the United States October term, 1930 October 19, 1931 Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., for petitioner. Mr. Ralph B. Evans, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Ordered, that the opinion in this case be amended as follows: (1) By substituting for the words 'In July, 1912,' in the 12th line of the last paragraph of the opinion, the following:
'August 20, 1912, the earliest date
claimed for Langmuir, was rejected, rightly, we think, by the
District Court, which held that Langmuir was anticipated by Arnold
in November, 1912. But before the earlier date,'
(2) By substituting for the 3d sentence from the end of
the following:
'By August, 1912, the Telegraph
Company used De Forest amplifying audions at 54 volts, and, by
November, they were used by another at 67 1/2 volts. This was
possible only because the tubes had thus been exhausted of gas
which would otherwise have ionized with blue glow at from 20 to 30
volts.'[ De Forest Radio Company v. General Electric Company
284 U.S.
571 (1931) ]
Search This Case
