Where a carrier accepts a check for the amount of freight
charges, and a loss is suffered as a result of its unjustifiable
delay in presenting it, the bank in the meantime having failed, the
question whether the shipper is relieved of liability depends upon
the general law applicable to payment by check, and not upon any
provision of the Interstate Commerce Act. P.
282 U. S.
521.
36 F.2d 180 reversed
Certiorari, 281 U.S. 709, to review a judgment of the circuit
court of appeals which affirmed a judgment of the district court in
favor of the railroad company in an action to recover freight
charges.
Page 282 U. S. 521
MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Chicago, Milwaukee, Saint Paul & Pacific Railroad
Company brought this action in the federal court for Minnesota to
recover from the Fullerton Lumber Company freight charges on a
carload of coal shipped to it. The case was tried without a jury.
The defense was payment. It appeared that, upon delivery of the
car, the carrier had, as customary, accepted the defendant's check
on a local bank for the amount of the charges; that it had delayed
presenting the check for payment, and that meanwhile the bank had
failed. The defendant contended that it was relieved from liability
because of the carrier's unjustifiable delay in presenting the
check. The trial court ruled that the Interstate Commerce Act
requires that a carrier's charges be paid strictly in currency, and
that, since the check had not been paid, the defendant was liable
even if the carrier's failure to receive the money was due wholly
to its own negligence. Judgment entered for the carrier was
affirmed by the circuit court of appeals, 36 F.2d 180. This Court
granted a writ of certiorari. 281 U.S. 709.
It has long been settled that payment of a carrier's charges
must be made in money, and that the payment must be cash, as
distinguished from credit.
* The purpose
Page 282 U. S. 522
of the requirement is solely to prevent rebates or unjust
discrimination and to ensure observance of the tariff rates.
Compare Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. Lindell,
281 U. S. 14,
281 U. S. 16.
The Interstate Commerce Act does not in terms prescribe that the
charges shall be paid in money -- that is, in coin or currency.
There is no reason for denying to the parties the convenience and
safety incident to making payment, in accordance with the
prevailing usage of business, by means of a check payable on demand
drawn on a going bank in which the drawer has an ample deposit.
Whether, in the case at bar, the defendant is liable depends not
upon any provision of the Interstate Commerce Act, but upon the
rules of law generally applicable to payment by check. These, and
other questions which have been argued, need not be considered by
us.
Reversed.
* Conference Ruling No. 207 of Interstate Commerce Commission
(September 15, 1906);
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v.
Mottley, 219 U. S. 467,
219 U. S. 476;
Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. United
States, 219 U. S. 486;
Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. v. Lindell,
281 U. S. 14,
281 U. S. 16.
Compare Ex parte No. 73, 57 I.C.C. 591, 596; 63 I.C.C.
375; 69 I.C.C. 351. Rules promulgated June 4, 1920, permitted the
carrier to extend credit for ninety-six hours after delivery, and
provided that "the mailing (within this prescribed period) by the
shipper of valid checks, drafts, or money orders which are
satisfactory to the carrier" should be deemed proper payment. Ex
parte No. 73, Rule 5, 57 I.C.C. 596a, 596b.