Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Co., 261 U.S. 398 (1923)
U.S. Supreme Court
Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Co., 261 U.S. 398 (1923)Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Company
Nos. 570 and 886
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 12, 1923
Decided April 9, 1923
261 U.S. 398
Syllabus
Decided on the authority of Hallanan v. Eureka Pipe Line Co., ante, 261 U. S. 393.
Petition for certiorari (No. 570) denied.
Writ of error (No. 886) dismissed.
Writ of error and petition for certiorari to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, entered after the reversal of the same case by this Court in United Fuel Cas Co. v. Hallanan, 257 U. S. 277.
U.S. Supreme Court
Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Co., 261 U.S. 398 (1923)Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Company
Nos. 570 and 886
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 12, 1923
Decided April 9, 1923
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND IN ERROR TO
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Syllabus
Decided on the authority of Hallanan v. Eureka Pipe Line Co., ante, 261 U. S. 393.
Petition for certiorari (No. 570) denied.
Writ of error (No. 886) dismissed.
Writ of error and petition for certiorari to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, entered after the reversal of the same case by this Court in United Fuel Cas Co. v. Hallanan, 257 U. S. 277.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a case like that of Hallanan v. Eureka Pipe Line Co., ante, 261 U. S. 393, involving the question
whether the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia has complied with the mandate of this Court issued on a judgment entered in the case of United Fuel Gas Co. v. Hallanan, decided December 12, 1921, 257 U. S. 277. It is in all respects similar to that in Eureka Pipe Line Co. case, and requires the same judgment.
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied, and the writ of error is dismissed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.