HAYES v. HOCKING VALLEY R. CO., 249 U.S. 591 (1919)
U.S. Supreme Court
HAYES v. HOCKING VALLEY R. CO. , 249 U.S. 591 (1919)249 U.S. 591
Webb C. HAYES, plintiff in error,
v.
The HOCKING VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY.
No. 388.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 28, 1919
Mr. Chas. A. Seiders, of Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. John F. Wilson, of Columbus, Ohio, and Lloyd T. Williams, of Toledo, Ohio (Messrs. Wilson & Rector, of Columbus, Ohio, and Brown, Geddes, Schmettau & Williams, of Toledo, Ohio, of counsel), for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of
Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S.
89, 100, 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State- Idaho Mining Co. v.
Hanley, 205 U.S.
225, 232, 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S.
71, 79, 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S.
216, 218, 35 S. Sup. Ct. 285.
U.S. Supreme Court
HAYES v. HOCKING VALLEY R. CO. , 249 U.S. 591 (1919) 249 U.S. 591 Webb C. HAYES, plintiff in error,v.
The HOCKING VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY.
No. 388.
Supreme Court of the United States April 28, 1919 Page 249 U.S. 591, 592 Mr. Chas. A. Seiders, of Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiff in error. Messrs. John F. Wilson, of Columbus, Ohio, and Lloyd T. Williams, of Toledo, Ohio (Messrs. Wilson & Rector, of Columbus, Ohio, and Brown, Geddes, Schmettau & Williams, of Toledo, Ohio, of counsel), for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100, 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State- Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232, 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79, 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216, 218, 35 S. Sup. Ct. 285.
