Day v. Chism,
23 U.S. 449 (1825)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Day v. Chism, 23 U.S. 10 Wheat. 449 449 (1825)

Day v. Chism

23 U.S. (10 Wheat.) 449


In a declaration upon a covenant of warranty, it is necessary to allege substantially an eviction by title paramount, but no formal terms are prescribed in which the averment is to be made.

Where it was averred in such a declaration

"that the said O. had not a good and sufficient title to the said tract of land, and by reason thereof the said plaintiffs were ousted and dispossessed of the said premises by due course of law,"

it was held sufficient as a substantial averment of an eviction by title paramount.

Where the plaintiffs declared in covenant both as heirs and devisees, without showing in particular how they were heirs and without setting out the will, it was held not to be fatal on general demurrer.

Such a defect may be amended under the thirty-second section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20.

Page 23 U. S. 450

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.