WENAR v. JONES, 217 U.S. 593 (1910)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
WENAR v. JONES, 217 U.S. 593 (1910)217 U.S. 593
JOSEPH WENAR, Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM A. JONES, Bishop of Porto Rico.
No. 143.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 25, 1910
Mr. Willis Sweet for appellant.
Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, Paul Fuller, and Howard Thayer Kingsbury for appellee.
Per Curiam:
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Harrington v. Holler
( Crawford v. Haller) 111 U.S. 796, 28 L. Ed.
602, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 697, and cases cited.
Opinions
v.
WILLIAM A. JONES, Bishop of Porto Rico.
No. 143.
Supreme Court of the United States April 25, 1910 Mr. Willis Sweet for appellant. Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, Paul Fuller, and Howard Thayer Kingsbury for appellee. Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Harrington v. Holler ( Crawford v. Haller) 111 U.S. 796, 28 L. Ed. 602, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 697, and cases cited.
U.S. Supreme Court
WENAR v. JONES, 217 U.S. 593 (1910) 217 U.S. 593 JOSEPH WENAR, Appellant,v.
WILLIAM A. JONES, Bishop of Porto Rico.
No. 143.
Supreme Court of the United States April 25, 1910 Mr. Willis Sweet for appellant. Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, Paul Fuller, and Howard Thayer Kingsbury for appellee. Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Harrington v. Holler ( Crawford v. Haller) 111 U.S. 796, 28 L. Ed. 602, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 697, and cases cited.
Search This Case
