KENYON v. FOWLER, 215 U.S. 593 (1910)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
KENYON v. FOWLER, 215 U.S. 593 (1910)215 U.S. 593
OTIS W. KENYON, Plaintiff in
Error,
v.
ALBERT P. FOWLER, as receiver of the American Exchange National
Bank of Syracuse.
No. 87.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 24, 1910
Mr. Dorr Raymond Cobb for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Leonard C. Crouch for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the Circuit
Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
Keyser v. Hitz, 133
U.S. 138, 33 L. Ed. 531, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 290; Finn v. Brown,
142 U.S. 56, 35 L.
Ed. 936, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136; Richmond v. Irons, 121 U.S. 27 30 L. Ed. 864,
7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 788; Matteson v. Dent, 176 U.S. 521, 44 L. Ed.
571, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419.
Opinions
v.
ALBERT P. FOWLER, as receiver of the American Exchange National Bank of Syracuse.
No. 87.
Supreme Court of the United States January 24, 1910 Mr. Dorr Raymond Cobb for plaintiff in error. Mr. Leonard C. Crouch for defendant in error. Per Curiam: Judgment affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Keyser v. Hitz, 133 U.S. 138, 33 L. Ed. 531, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 290; Finn v. Brown, 142 U.S. 56, 35 L. Ed. 936, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136; Richmond v. Irons, 121 U.S. 27 30 L. Ed. 864, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 788; Matteson v. Dent, 176 U.S. 521, 44 L. Ed. 571, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419.
U.S. Supreme Court
KENYON v. FOWLER, 215 U.S. 593 (1910) 215 U.S. 593 OTIS W. KENYON, Plaintiff in Error,v.
ALBERT P. FOWLER, as receiver of the American Exchange National Bank of Syracuse.
No. 87.
Supreme Court of the United States January 24, 1910 Mr. Dorr Raymond Cobb for plaintiff in error. Mr. Leonard C. Crouch for defendant in error. Per Curiam: Judgment affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Keyser v. Hitz, 133 U.S. 138, 33 L. Ed. 531, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 290; Finn v. Brown, 142 U.S. 56, 35 L. Ed. 936, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136; Richmond v. Irons, 121 U.S. 27 30 L. Ed. 864, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 788; Matteson v. Dent, 176 U.S. 521, 44 L. Ed. 571, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419.
Search This Case
