LOGAN v. FARMERS' DEPOSIT NAT BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 214 U.S. 500 (1909)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LOGAN v. FARMERS' DEPOSIT NAT BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 214 U.S. 500 (1909)214 U.S. 500
FRANK J. LOGAN et al.,
Appellants,
v.
FARMERS' DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA. et al.
No. 745.
April 26, 1909
Messrs. A. Leo Weil and B. M. Ambler for appellees.
Mr. Hector M. Hitchings for appellants.
Per Curiam:
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of Coder
v. Arts, decided April 5, 1909, 213 U.S. 223, 53 L. ed.
--, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 436.
Opinions
v.
FARMERS' DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA. et al.
No. 745.
April 26, 1909 Messrs. A. Leo Weil and B. M. Ambler for appellees. Page 214 U.S. 500, 501 Mr. Hector M. Hitchings for appellants. Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of Coder v. Arts, decided April 5, 1909, 213 U.S. 223, 53 L. ed. --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 436.
U.S. Supreme Court
LOGAN v. FARMERS' DEPOSIT NAT BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 214 U.S. 500 (1909) 214 U.S. 500 FRANK J. LOGAN et al., Appellants,v.
FARMERS' DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA. et al.
No. 745.
April 26, 1909 Messrs. A. Leo Weil and B. M. Ambler for appellees. Page 214 U.S. 500, 501 Mr. Hector M. Hitchings for appellants. Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of Coder v. Arts, decided April 5, 1909, 213 U.S. 223, 53 L. ed. --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 436.
Search This Case
