KESSLER v. TREAT, 205 U.S. 33 (1907)
U.S. Supreme Court
KESSLER v. TREAT, 205 U.S. 33 (1907)
205 U.S. 33
WILLIAM De. C. KESSLER v. MORGAN TREAT, United States Marshal, el al.
SAMUEL T. MORGAN v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
AUSTIN B. CARPENTER v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
FORTESQUE WHITTLE v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
FRANK E. WILCOX v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
GEORGE BRADEN v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
FRANK S. ROYSTER v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
J. RICE SMITH v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
CHARLES F. BURROUGHS v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
CHARLES H. McDOWELL v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
Nos. 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379.
Argued December 3, 4, 1906.
Decided March 4, 1907.
Messrs. John S. Miller, John J. Vertrees, Henry A. M. Smith, and James C. Bradford for appellants. Mr. James P. Helm for appellant in No. 375. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds and Solicitor General Hoyt for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:
The same decrees will be entered in each of these cases as in the foregoing.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissented.
Mr. Justice Moody took no part.
U.S. Supreme Court
KESSLER v. TREAT, 205 U.S. 33 (1907)
WILLIAM De. C. KESSLER v. MORGAN TREAT, United States Marshal, el al.
SAMUEL T. MORGAN v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
AUSTIN B. CARPENTER v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
FORTESQUE WHITTLE v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
FRANK E. WILCOX v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
GEORGE BRADEN v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
FRANK S. ROYSTER v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
J. RICE SMITH v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
CHARLES F. BURROUGHS v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
CHARLES H. McDOWELL v. MORGAN TREAT, etc.
Nos. 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379.
Argued December 3, 4, 1906.
Decided March 4, 1907.
Messrs. John S. Miller, John J. Vertrees, Henry A. M. Smith, and James C. Bradford for appellants. Mr. James P. Helm for appellant in No. 375. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds and Solicitor General Hoyt for appellees.
Page 205 U.S. 33, 34
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:
The same decrees will be entered in each of these cases as in the foregoing.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissented.
Mr. Justice Moody took no part.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.