Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency
Docket No.
23-1067
Granted:
October 21, 2024
Argued:
March 25, 2025
Materials
| Letter Notifying of Fifth Circuit Opinion of Oklahoma, et al. submitted. |
| Letter Notifying of Fifth Circuit Opinion of Oklahoma, et al. submitted. |
| Argued. For petitioners in 23-1067: Mithun Mansinghani, Oklahoma City, Okla. For petitioners in 23-1068: Misha Tseytlin, Chicago, Ill. For respondents: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. VIDED. |
| Motion for divided argument filed by petitioners GRANTED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. VIDED. |
| CIRCULATED |
| Reply of Oklahoma, et al. submitted. |
| Reply of petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. filed (as to 23-1068). (Distributed) |
| Reply of petitioners Oklahoma, et al. filed (as to 23-1067). (Distributed) |
| Reply of petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. filed (as to 23-1068). (Distributed) |
| Reply of petitioners Oklahoma, et al. filed (as to 23-1067). (Distributed) |
| Reply of PacifiCorp, et al. submitted. |
| Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. |
| Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and available with the Clerk. |
| SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 25, 2025. VIDED. |
| Motion of the Acting Solicitor General to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. VIDED. |
| Response in opposition to motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance from petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Response of PacifiCorp, et al. to motion submitted. |
| Response in opposition to motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance from petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Response of Oklahoma, et al. to motion submitted. |
| Response in opposition to motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance from petitioners Oklahoma, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Response in opposition to motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance from petitioners Oklahoma, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Motion for divided argument filed by petitioners. VIDED. |
| Motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance filed by respondents EPA, et al. VIDED. (Distributed) |
| Motion for divided argument filed jointly by petitioners. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of Jonathan Cannon, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of New York, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance filed by respondents EPA, et al. VIDED. (Distributed) |
| Motion for divided argument filed by petitioners. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of Jonathan Cannon, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of New York, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Motion of the Respondents to hold the Briefing Schedule in Abeyance of EPA, et al. submitted. |
| Amicus brief of Former EPA General Counsels Jonathan Cannon, E. Donald Elliott, and Avi Garbow submitted. |
| Motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance filed by respondents EPA, et al. VIDED. |
| Amicus brief of States of New York, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai‘i, Illinois, Maine, Mary¬land, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin; the District of Columbia; Harris County, Texas; and the City of New York submitted. |
| Motion of PacifiCorp, et al. for divided argument submitted. |
| Brief for the Federal Respondents of EPA, et al. submitted. |
| Brief of respondents EPA, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Brief of respondents EPA, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of Arkansas, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of neither party filed. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senator Mike Lee, et al. filed. |
| Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America submitted. |
| Amicus brief of U.S. Senators Mike Lee, Cynthia Lummis, Roger Marshall, and Ted Budd submitted. |
| Amicus brief of State of Arkansas, et al. submitted. |
| Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senator Mike Lee, et al. (as to 23-1067) filed. |
| Brief amici curiae of Arkansas, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senator Mike Lee, et al. (as to 23-1067) filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of neither party filed. VIDED. |
| Brief of petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. (as to 23-1068) filed. |
| Brief of petitioners Oklahoma, et al. (as to 23-1067) filed. |
| Brief of petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. (as to 23-1068) filed. |
| Brief of PacifiCorp, et al. submitted. |
| Brief of Oklahoma, et al. submitted. |
| Joint appendix filed. VIDED. |
| Brief of petitioners Oklahoma, et al. filed. |
| Joint Appendix submitted. |
| Brief of petitioners PacifiCorp, et al.( In 23-1068) filed. |
| Joint appendix filed. VIDED. (Statement of costs filed) |
| Brief of petitioners Oklahoma, et al. (as to 23-1067) filed. |
| Joint appendix filed. VIDED. (Statement of costs filed) |
| Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' briefs on the merits is extended to and including December 13, 2024. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 17, 2025. VIDED. |
| Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. VIDED. |
| Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. VIDED. |
| Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 23-1067. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 23-1067. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
| Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 23-1068 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. VIDED. |
| DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024. |
| DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024. |
| DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024. |
| Reply of petitioners Oklahoma, et al. filed. |
| Reply of petitioners Oklahoma, et al. filed. |
| Rescheduled. |
| DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024. |
| Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner. |
| Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner. |
| Brief for the Federal Respondents filed. VIDED. |
| Brief for the Federal Respondents filed. VIDED. |
| Brief amici curiae of Arkansas, et al. filed. |
| Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senators Mike Lee, et al. filed. |
| Brief amici curiae of Arkansas, et al. filed. |
| Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senators Mike Lee, et al. filed. |
| Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 21, 2024. |
| Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 1, 2024 to May 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 1, 2024 to May 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2024) |
| Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2024) |
Search This Case
