METROPOLITAN R CO v. CHURCH, 174 U.S. 46 (1899)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
METROPOLITAN R CO v. CHURCH, 174 U.S. 46 (1899)174 U.S. 46
METROPOLITAN RY. CO.
v.
CHURCH.
BRIGHTWOOD RY. CO.
v.
O'NEAL.
Nos. 114 and 195.
April 11, 1899
D. W. Baker, for Metropolitan Ry. Co. H. P. Blair, for Brightwood Ry. Co. E. L. Schmidt, for Church.
Raymond A. Heiskell and M. J. Colbert, for O'Neal.
Mr. Justice GRAY.
This case, argued at the same time with Traction Co. v. Hof, 19
Sup. Ct. 580, the judgments of the court of appeals of the District
of Columbia, quashing writs of certiorari to set aside proceedings
of a justice of the peace under similar circumstances, are likewise
affirmed.[ Metropolitan R Co v. Church 174 U.S. 46 (1899) ]
Opinions
v.
CHURCH. BRIGHTWOOD RY. CO.
v.
O'NEAL. Nos. 114 and 195. April 11, 1899 D. W. Baker, for Metropolitan Ry. Co. H. P. Blair, for Brightwood Ry. Co. E. L. Schmidt, for Church. Raymond A. Heiskell and M. J. Colbert, for O'Neal. Mr. Justice GRAY. This case, argued at the same time with Traction Co. v. Hof, 19 Sup. Ct. 580, the judgments of the court of appeals of the District of Columbia, quashing writs of certiorari to set aside proceedings of a justice of the peace under similar circumstances, are likewise affirmed.[ Metropolitan R Co v. Church 174 U.S. 46 (1899) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
METROPOLITAN R CO v. CHURCH, 174 U.S. 46 (1899) 174 U.S. 46 METROPOLITAN RY. CO.v.
CHURCH. BRIGHTWOOD RY. CO.
v.
O'NEAL. Nos. 114 and 195. April 11, 1899 D. W. Baker, for Metropolitan Ry. Co. H. P. Blair, for Brightwood Ry. Co. E. L. Schmidt, for Church. Raymond A. Heiskell and M. J. Colbert, for O'Neal. Mr. Justice GRAY. This case, argued at the same time with Traction Co. v. Hof, 19 Sup. Ct. 580, the judgments of the court of appeals of the District of Columbia, quashing writs of certiorari to set aside proceedings of a justice of the peace under similar circumstances, are likewise affirmed.[ Metropolitan R Co v. Church 174 U.S. 46 (1899) ]
Search This Case
