Chaves v. United States, 168 U.S. 177 (1897)
U.S. Supreme Court
Chaves v. United States, 168 U.S. 177 (1897)Chaves v. United States
No. 4
Argued October 12, 1897
Decided November 15, 1897
168 U.S. 177
Syllabus
By the Spanish law in force at the time of the alleged grant of 1788, set up in this case, lots and lands were distributed to those who were intending to settle, and it was provided that,
"when said settlers shall have lived and labored in said settlements during the space of four years, they are hereby empowered, from the expiration of said term, to sell the same, and freely to dispose of them at their will, as their own property,"
but confirmation after the four years had elapsed was required in completion of the legal title, and it was further provided that it should
"not be lawful to give or distribute lands in a settlement to such persons as already possess some in another settlement, unless they shall leave their former residence and remove themselves to the new place to be settled, except where they shall have resided in the first settlement during the four years necessary to entitle them to fee simple right, or unless they shall relinquish their title to the same for not having fulfilled their obligation."
On the facts in this case, it is held that the granting papers in this record, taken together, do not justify the presumption of settlement and working by the two Garcias on the tract contained in the grant of 1788, for the ten years prior to 1798 or for four years thereof, or any confirmation of the grant thereupon, but that the contrary is to be inferred from the testimony in respect of possession; that Armenta's
certificate of 1798 and the correspondence of 1808 conduct to no other result, and that, in the light of all the evidence, the conclusion of the court below was correct.
This was a petition filed by heirs and legal representatives of Francisco Garcia de Noriega and Jose Antonio Garcia de Noriega, for the confirmation of an alleged grant made by Governor Concha, January 27, 1788, of 9,752.57 acres, called the "Canyon de San Diego," situated in the County of Bernallilo, New Mexico, and included within a grant of 116,288.89 acres by Governor Chacon, March 6, 1798, alleged in the petition to have been to the "Town of the Canyon de San Diego."
The granting papers of 1788 were produced and placed in the archives of the government by claimants in 1879. As translated by the government, they read as follows:
"Senior Governor Don Fernando de la Concha:"
"We, Francisco Garcia de Noriega, interpreter for the Navajos, and Jose Antonio Garcia de Noriega, with the most profound respect appear before your excellency, and state, sir, that a canyon which is called 'San Diego,' being found vacant, having seen that cultivation may be had, and some animals pastured, therein, we prostrate ourselves at the royal feet of your excellency's grandeur solely to ask and pray that you deign in the name of his majesty to favor us by giving us the said canyon for the purposes mentioned, on account of finding ourselves lacking land for planting, and deserving that his majesty should favor us we ask as a grant the said canyon; on account of all which we ask and pray that your excellency be well pleased to command that what we request be done, that, by your so doing we shall receive great benefit and favor, etc."
"Francisco Garcia de Noriega [Scroll]"
"Jose Antonio Garcia [Scroll]"
"Santa Fe, January 27, 1788"
"I grant, in the name of the King, the cultivation and working of the land which the petitioners ask for, the chief alcalde of the Queres, Don Antonio Armenta, placing them in
possession thereof, provided that no prejudice results to the Indians and residents settled in that vicinity; and, it having been so done, following this decree he shall place the said taking of possession without prejudice to a third party, in order to copy it in the government book, and to write it out on stamped paper when the same shall reach this province."
"Concha [Scroll]"
"At this Canyon of San Diego, on the sixth day of the month of February, of the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight, I, Don Antonio de Armenta, chief alcalde, and war captain of the jurisdiction of the Queres, by virtue of the authority that is conferred upon me by Senor Don Fernando de la Concha, Knight Commander of Mora in the Order of Santiago, lieutenant colonel of the royal armies, civil and military governor of this Province of New Mexico, being at the said canyon, having cited the natives of the pueblo of Jemez, who are the adjoining owners to said land, and having designated to them that which was their own, they were well suited on account of receiving no injury by the giving of said canyon, and also knowing that it is the will of our sovereign that his lands be peopled by his vassals in whatever surplus there may be, and finding no obstacle whatever that could interfere with it, and exercising the authority that is conferred upon me, I went to said Canyon of San Diego, and, no one appearing who had a better right, nor there being any prejudice to a third party who might make objection, and said Indians, Francisco Garcia de Noriega, interpreter for the Navajos, and his brother, Jose Antonio Garcia de Noriega, being present, and understanding it all, I took them by the hand, I conducted them over said lands, they pulled up grass, threw stones to the four cardinal points, and we all said together three times, 'Long live the King, our lord, whom may God preserve,' as evidence of true possession, which they received quietly and peaceably without any opposition, their boundaries being the following: on the north side, the waterfall (salto del argua); on the south side, the junction of the rivers, and also a point of a red table land (una mesa colorada),
and lands of said Indians. With respect to the east and west, there is nothing more than some very high table lands on both sides of the canyon, which [table lands] serve as boundaries. And, there resulting no prejudice whatever, they were satisfied with them [the boundaries], and in order that it may so appear, I, said chief alcalde, Don Antonio de Armenta, signed it, together with my two attending witnesses, with whom I act for lack of a public or royal notary, of which there is none of any kind in all this government; to all of which I certify."
"The interlineation 'river' is valid."
"Antonio de Armenta [Scroll]"
"[Armenta's scroll]"
"Witness: Salvador Antonio Sandoval [Scroll]"
"Witness: Nicolas Ortiz [Scroll]"
There are some differences between petitioners' translations and those of the government, the principal being in the opening words of the alleged grant, which, in Spanish, were: "Concedo en nombre del Rey el cultivo y labor de la tierra que solicitan los Supplicantes," etc. These words are translated by petitioners: "I grant in the name of the King, for cultivation and working, the land that the petitioners solicit," and by the government: "I grant, in the name of the King, the cultivation and working of the land which the petitioners ask for."
The granting papers of the grant of 1798 were as follows:
"Seal Third [Seal] Two Rials"
"For the Years One Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-Eight and Ninety-Nine."
"To the Lieutenant Colonel and Governor of this Province:"
"Francisco and Antonio Garcia, brothers, and interpreters of the Navajo Nation, in unison with Miguel Garcia, Joaquin Montoya, Salvador Garcia, Jose Manuel Garcia, Juan Jose Gutierez, Juan de Aguilar, Blas Nepumuceno Garcia, Bartholomew Montoya, Jose Montoya, Tomas Montoya, Juan Domingo Martin, Jose Gonzales, Salvador Lopes, Antonio
Abad Garcia, Miguel Gallego, Marcos Apodaca, Jose Miguel Duran, and Jose Maria Jaramillo, appear before your excellency in the most approved manner the law requires and may be necessary, and state that a quantity of vacant and uncultivated land lies in the Canyon of San Diego, adjoining the boundaries of the land belonging to the Indians of the Town of Jemez, and whereas, the settlement thereof would be beneficial to the provinces, and advantageous to our present families and descendants to be settling upon these lands with our property, and cultivating the same. We pray your excellency to be pleased to grant this aid and settlement that we petition for to the persons herein mentioned; being pleased at the same time to order, in the name of his majesty (whom may God preserve), that we may receive from the boundaries beyond the land granted to the Indians of the pueblo, our petition calling for from east to west to the middle arroyo called 'Los Torreones,' and the line running from north to south to the Vallecelo de la Cueva which is in front of the waterfall, and in a transverse line from said middle arroyo to the Rito de la Jara. We also protest that we will not injure with our persons or stock a few trees which the Indians claim as their own, although they are planted beyond the limits of the lands which belong to them. Therefore we humbly pray your excellency to be pleased to order our request to be complied with, granting us the vacant land asked for, by doing which we will receive grace, and we swear, in due form, that our petition is not made through malice, and one signed, the others not knowing how."
"Jose Miguel Garcia"
"Decree"
"In view of the foregoing petition made by Jose Miguel Garcia and other citizens therein mentioned, in regard to settling in the canyon known as 'San Diego de Jemez,' where the interpreters of the Navajo Nation were temporarily stationed, I grant to them the aforesaid land in the name of the King, our sovereign, with the expressed condition that it is to be settled by at least twenty citizens; that the lands are to be
distributed in equal parts, and that they are not allowed or authorized, for themselves or their heirs, to sell or dispose of the lands granted to them, it being his majesty's will, according to his last orders, that the lands should descend from father to son, or his heirs in a direct line, and if any colonist, to suit his own conscience, should desire to remove, under any pretext whatever, his possession or share shall remain for the benefit of the one taking his place, in which case the residents of the same place, or persons marrying there, shall be preferred, and for which no remuneration whatever shall be exacted by the person voluntarily absenting himself, or expelled or banished by the authorities on account of his bad conduct; that, besides the subdivision above mentioned, a sufficient amount of land is to be left for pastures and watering places, as well as to allow for the increase of the settlement, if such may be the case (which is likely to occur) -- [torn] -- order of the Chief Justice of that jurisdiction, Don Antonio Armenta, to place the parties in possession under the rules prescribed by law."
"Chacon"
"Possession"
"In the Canyon de San Diego de los Jemez, on the fourteenth day of the month of March, in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight, I, Don Antonio Armenta, Chief Justice of the pueblo of Jemez, by virtue of the authority conferred upon me by my superior, Don Fernando Chacon, gentleman of the Order of Santiago, lieutenant colonel of the royal armies, political and military governor of this province of New Mexico, being at the aforesaid place, and having summoned the natives of said pueblo of Jemez, to whom having measured the league belonging to them, I found a surplus of two thousand one hundred varas, which they had before arriving at the Canyon de San Diego, all of which they claimed as their own, without having any right to them in any manner, and believing that it is the wish of our sovereign that his land be settled upon by his subjects wherever a surplus may be found, and finding no impediment whatever, and using the authority in me vested, I proceeded to the surplus lands, and, finding no one with a better title, and Francisco Garcia, Antonio
Garcia, Navajo interpreters, Miguel Garcia, Joaquin Montoya, Salvador Garcia, Jose Manuel Garcia, Juan Jose Gutierrez, Juan de Aguilar, Juan Blas Pumuceno Garcia, Bartolome Montes, Tomas Montoya, Jose Montoya, Juan Domingo Sangil, Salvador Lopez, Jose Gonzales, Antonio Abad Garcia, Miguel Gallegos, Marcos Apodaca, Jose Miguel Duran, and Jose Jaramillo, being present, all interested and well informed in regard to the matter, I took them by the hand, walked them over said lands, they pulled up grass, threw stones towards the four winds, and we all cried at once, three times, 'Live the King, our sovereign, whom may God preserve,' in proof of legal possession, which they received quietly and peaceably without any opposition whatever, because, after concluding all these ceremonies, I delivered to each one of the said settlers three hundred varas, with which they were well satisfied, leaving the remainder for the benefit of all, and without any other lands being left for any person to enter; and, in order to prevent any other from coming to meddle and create difficulties between the citizens, as well as the Indians. I gave time to understand which were their boundaries, which are: on the north, the Vallecito de la Cueva; on the south, the termination of the Indian league; on the east, the boundary of Vallecito, and on the west, the opening towards the middle arroyo and the Rito de la Jara -- and, no injury resulting to anyone, they were all satisfied; and, in order that it may so appear, I, the said chief justice, signed with my two attending witnesses in the absence of a public or royal notary, there being none within the limits of all this government, to which I certify."
"Antonio de Armenta"
"Witnesses:"
"Salvador Lopez"
"Jose Miguel Garcia"
In 1879, when the documents of 1788 were produced by claimants and filed in the archives, the following certificate was also brought forward by them and put on file:
"In the Canyon de San Diego de Jemez on the fourteenth day of the month of March, year 1798, before me, Antonio
de Armenta, and there being assembled all the citizens who took possession of the said canyon, together with Francisco Garcia de Noriega and Antonio Garcia de Noriega, two brothers of the first possessors, said Garcias declared in a loud and clear voice, which all heard, because they shouted it with much distinctness, and they all unanimously agreed to abide by what was said by the said Garcias, and their reasons were these: friends and brothers, now each of you is about to take the lands which his majesty has granted and donated to you; but you are all notified that the lands, which we first and in our first grant, we have been possessing, be all of you aware that I and my brother are going to enjoy the same freely, without any of those present, nor their children, nor anybody else shall desire to interpose obstacles. And because as first possessors we have the right to enjoy said lands and to cultivate them with full title, as well ourselves, our children, and our successors, and so that none of those who are present may plead ignorance, we have so spoken today, there being no one absent. The said Garcias having made all the remarks, all unanimously replied that they asked reasonable justice, and that neither by themselves, their children, nor successors would there be interposed any suit or demand against them at any time, and if they perchance should wish to do so, they would take the case until leaving them in peace concerning the said land which they had been so justly possessing."
"All here set forth I, said chief justice, witness, for all of the citizens declared that it was not to them any imposition that the Messrs. Garcias should enjoy the lands which they were heretofore cultivating, and that it may so appear whenever requisite I will make this document in favor of the said two Garcias. I sign the same, with those of my attendance, in the aforesaid canyon, in said day, month, and year, to which I certify."
"Anto. de Armenta"
It also appeared that there were among the old archives the following:
"Governor: The interpreter of the Navajos, Antonio Garcia, has presented to me a document executed to him by the former alcalde of this jurisdiction, Antonio de Armenta, under the decree of Don Fernando de la Concha, as appears from the grant itself, and the whole of the Jemez Canyon, having been settled under an order of Don Fernando Chacon in a royal grant made to them and in which it embraced the lands granted to the Garcias, whence results contention between the one and the others, the latter grantees alleging title to all the land, and I, deeming that the title claimed by Antonio Garcia is founded in law, he having been the prior settler for the period of ten years, with the condition that at the time they were given possession all the new settlers gave their consent, as said Garcia makes appear by a document which the alcalde executed to the two brothers and which I enclose to you, together with the grant of the Garcias, so that, after seeing you may order whatever you shall deem proper, and may, if Garcia has a right to the land claimed, confirm and approve the same, to obviate all questions which will necessarily result if the latter be not decided by your superiority, that the land of the Garcias is included or not in the grant of the last settlers, and whether a copy of this grant be taken, so that the original, which is the one I enclose, may remain in the archives of the government confirmed by you, and the same to be done with a copy, subject to what you may direct, which will be the best and most correct, your ordering what I shall do to avoid proceedings annoying your attention. God preserve you many years."
"Ignatio Sanchez Vergara"
"Santa Ana, 1st of December, 1808"
"Lieutenant Colonel Jose Manrique"
"Advised of your official communication of the first instant and documents you accompany."
"I will state to you that the subject does not require any decision of mine, inasmuch as the grant of the Garcias makes their right clear, which grant, being the older, always has a
preference. The last settlers cannot deny to the Garcias a better title, and so these should always remain on the same grant which they have held hitherto; and if the said new settlers do not coincide, you will not permit them recourse for and such which they may possess, they will not have the royal audience of Guadalajara, as the documents referred to were sanctioned by former governors of this province, and the said royal audience alone can annul them, with which I answer your official communication before mentioned. I return to you the documents mentioned, that you may deliver them to the party interested. God preserve you many years."
"Santa Fe, 13th of December, 1808"
"To the Alcalde of Jemez"
On the 4th day of June, 1859, certain claimants, for themselves and in the name of the actual settlers, petitioned the surveyor general of New Mexico, Pelham, for a confirmation of the grant of March 6, 1798, who took action thereon. In the proceedings, it appeared from the evidence that a town existed on the grant some sixty years before, and was in existence when the United States took possession, and the testimonio of the original granting papers, heretofore given, certified to as correct and genuine by the alcalde, Don Antonio Armenta, with his attending witnesses, on March 16, 1798, in due form, "at the verbal request of the parties," which was then on file in the office of the surveyor general, was considered and acted on by him. The surveyor general made his report to Congress under date June 10, 1859, approving the grant, and stating that
"the evidence shows that the town has been in continuous occupation of the claimants, and was in existence when the United States assumed sovereignty over the country."
The grant was thereupon confirmed by Congress, June 21, 1860, 12 Stat. 71, c. 167, §3. The patent for this grant was issued October 21, 1881, to the original twenty grantees and those claiming under or through them.
In 1879, Amado Chaves, for himself and the other heirs of the two Garcias, petitioned the then surveyor general, Atkinson, for the approval and confirmation of the grant of 1788.
and in the proceedings before him the papers of that date, together with the certificate of Alcalde Armental of March 14, 1798, were produced and filed, and considered with the correspondence of 1808, and sundry depositions. The surveyor general approved the grant March 22, 1880, and transmitted a certified transcript of the papers for the action of Congress, but the grant was not confirmed.
The evidence tended to show that Francisco and Antonio Garcia were two Spanish brothers who were interpreters for the Navajos; that Francisco was killed in 1807, and that Antonio died in 1835.
The depositions of two witnesses -- one of them the great-grandson of Francisco Garcia, born in 1827, and the other the grandson of Antonio Garcia, born in 1807 -- were taken by Surveyor General Atkinson in January, 1880. Both gave the south boundary of the tract sued for as the junction of the San Diego and the Guadalupe Rivers "and the lands of the Indian pueblo of Jemez." Both testified that the tract was reputed to belong to the heirs of the two Garcias; that Francisco was reputed to have lived thereon, and that Antonio, who survived until 1835, lived there to their knowledge.
In addition to these depositions, petitioners called as a witness another great-grandson of Francisco, born in 1850, who testified that his grandmother was born on the tract, and that "she said the land was occupied and cultivated by them," the two Garcias. What particular part of the tract she was born on, and the particular place of occupancy and cultivation, did not appear.
The evidence on behalf of the government was to the effect that Antonio Garcia occupied land several hundred varas in extent, running north from the north boundary line of the Indian pueblo, which was subsequently sold by Antonio's grandson to one of the witnesses, who thereupon took up his residence in Antonio's house; that Antonio said that he had "lands in the Indians' league, . . . from the pueblo Indian league up north;" that the ranches were in the canyon, and divided into portions of 300 varas each; that heirs of the original grantees, or persons claiming under them, still held
original allotments north of the junction of the rivers, and that the smaller grant was not generally known.
The survey of May 18, 1880, was as follows:
image:a
The Court of Private Land Claims, two members dissenting, held that the claim under the grant of 1788 had been abandoned, and dismissed the petition.
