TIOGA R CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, 158 U.S. 440 (1895)
U.S. Supreme Court
TIOGA R CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, 158 U.S. 440 (1895)158 U.S. 440
TIOGA R. CO.
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.
NEW YORK, L. E. %& w. coal &
railroad co./
v.
SAME.
NEW YORK, P. & O. R. CO.
v.
SAME.
Nos. 264, 265, and 266.
May 27, 1895
Mr. Justice SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court.
are concerned, precisely like case No. 263, New York, L. E. & W. R. Co. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 15 Sup. Ct. 896. They call for no additional consideration, and, for the reasons given in No. 263, the judgment of the court below in the several cases is affirmed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents.
M. E. Olmsted. for Railroad Cos.
Henry C. McCormick, Atty. Gen. Pa., and Jas. A. Stranahan, for
the Commonwealth.
U.S. Supreme Court
TIOGA R CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, 158 U.S. 440 (1895) 158 U.S. 440 TIOGA R. CO.v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. NEW YORK, L. E. %& w. coal & railroad co./
v.
SAME. NEW YORK, P. & O. R. CO.
v.
SAME. Nos. 264, 265, and 266. May 27, 1895 Mr. Justice SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court. Page 158 U.S. 440, 441 are concerned, precisely like case No. 263, New York, L. E. & W. R. Co. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 15 Sup. Ct. 896. They call for no additional consideration, and, for the reasons given in No. 263, the judgment of the court below in the several cases is affirmed. Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents. M. E. Olmsted. for Railroad Cos. Henry C. McCormick, Atty. Gen. Pa., and Jas. A. Stranahan, for the Commonwealth.