UNDERHILL v. HERNDON, 154 U.S. 574 (1870)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
UNDERHILL v. HERNDON, 154 U.S. 574 (1870)154 U.S. 574
ISAAC UNDERHILL
v.
JOHN M. HERNDON.
No. 197.
April 30, 1870
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a writ of error to the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois.
This is a suit in ejectment against Underhill, in the court below,
to recover possession of the S. W. 1/4 of the N. E. 1/4, and the S. 1/2 of the N. W. 1/4, section 26, township 27 N., range 13 W.
The opinion in the case of Little v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 26, disposes of all the questions raised and decided in this case in the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
B. C. Cook, for plaintiff in error.
Conway Robinson, for defendant in error.
Opinions
v.
JOHN M. HERNDON.
No. 197.
April 30, 1870 Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court. This is a writ of error to the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois. This is a suit in ejectment against Underhill, in the court below, Page 154 U.S. 574, 575 to recover possession of the S. W. 1/4 of the N. E. 1/4, and the S. 1/2 of the N. W. 1/4, section 26, township 27 N., range 13 W. The opinion in the case of Little v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 26, disposes of all the questions raised and decided in this case in the court below. Judgment affirmed. B. C. Cook, for plaintiff in error. Conway Robinson, for defendant in error.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNDERHILL v. HERNDON, 154 U.S. 574 (1870) 154 U.S. 574 ISAAC UNDERHILLv.
JOHN M. HERNDON.
No. 197.
April 30, 1870 Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court. This is a writ of error to the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois. This is a suit in ejectment against Underhill, in the court below, Page 154 U.S. 574, 575 to recover possession of the S. W. 1/4 of the N. E. 1/4, and the S. 1/2 of the N. W. 1/4, section 26, township 27 N., range 13 W. The opinion in the case of Little v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 26, disposes of all the questions raised and decided in this case in the court below. Judgment affirmed. B. C. Cook, for plaintiff in error. Conway Robinson, for defendant in error.
Search This Case
