Boardman v. Toffey, 117 U.S. 271 (1886)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
Boardman v. Toffey, 117 U.S. 271 (1886)Boardman v. Toffey
Argued March 11, 1886
Decided March 15, 1886
117 U.S. 271
Syllabus
If the trial below is by the court without a jury, and the findings of facts are general, only such rulings of the court in the progress of the trial can be reviewed as are presented by a bill of exceptions.
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
Opinions
U.S. Supreme Court
Boardman v. Toffey, 117 U.S. 271 (1886) Boardman v. Toffey Argued March 11, 1886 Decided March 15, 1886 117 U.S. 271 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Syllabus If the trial below is by the court without a jury, and the findings of facts are general, only such rulings of the court in the progress of the trial can be reviewed as are presented by a bill of exceptions. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Page 117 U. S. 272 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. This judgment is affirmed. The trial was by the court without a jury, and there is no special finding of facts. The only questions presented by the bill of exceptions which we can consider are those which relate to the refusal of the court to allow certain interrogatories to be put to witnesses on the stand, and in these we find no error. The general finding prevents all inquiry by us into the special facts and conclusions of law on which that finding rests. Norris v. Jackson, 9 Wall. 125; Cooper v. Omohundro, 19 Wall. 69; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 673. Affirmed.
Search This Case
