FUSSELL v. HUGHES, 113 U.S. 565 (1885)
U.S. Supreme Court
FUSSELL v. HUGHES, 113 U.S. 565 (1885)113 U.S. 565
FUSSELL
v.
HUGHES and others. [Footnote
1]
February 2, 1885
The bill in this case was also filed November 20, 1879. It was based on the same alleged title as that in Fussell v. Gregg, ante, 631, and was
brought for a part of the lands covered by the same entry and survey, and prayed for the same relief. The same defenses were pleaded. It follows, from what has been said in Fussell v. Gregg, supra, that this suit is not within the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and that the plaintiff has no right whatever to the lands to which she seeks to establish title, and of which she prays to be put in possession. The decree of the circuit court by which the bill was dismissed was therefore right. Decree affirmed.
FootnotesFootnote 1 S. C. 8 Fed. Rep. 384.
U.S. Supreme Court
FUSSELL v. HUGHES, 113 U.S. 565 (1885) 113 U.S. 565 FUSSELLv.
HUGHES and others. [Footnote 1] February 2, 1885 The bill in this case was also filed November 20, 1879. It was based on the same alleged title as that in Fussell v. Gregg, ante, 631, and was Page 113 U.S. 565, 566 brought for a part of the lands covered by the same entry and survey, and prayed for the same relief. The same defenses were pleaded. It follows, from what has been said in Fussell v. Gregg, supra, that this suit is not within the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and that the plaintiff has no right whatever to the lands to which she seeks to establish title, and of which she prays to be put in possession. The decree of the circuit court by which the bill was dismissed was therefore right. Decree affirmed. Footnotes Footnote 1 S. C. 8 Fed. Rep. 384.
