The exercise of a preemption right under the Act of September 4,
1841, 5 Stat. 453, by an entry of one-quarter of a quarter section
of land, was an abandonment of the right to enter under that act
for the remaining three-quarters of that quarter section.
A person who, on the 8th March, 1870, had a title by patent to a
quarter of a quarter section of land and lived in a house erected
upon it, and cultivated the remaining three-quarters of the quarter
section without title, did not reside upon the three-quarters so
cultivated, within the meaning of c. 289, Acts of Arkansas, 1871,
which gave persons then residing upon lands belonging to or claimed
by the Cairo and Fulton Railroad Company, or its branches, the
right to purchase them not to exceed 160 acres.
Page 112 U. S. 130
The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the
Court.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a suit in equity, brought by John B. Nix, the appellant,
on the 2d day of May, 1879, enjoin the execution of a judgment in
ejectment recovered against him by Thomas Allen the appellee, on
the ___ of April, 1879, for the possession of the west half and the
southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of sec. 30, T. 15 S., R.
28 E., in Arkansas, and to obtain a conveyance of the legal title
to the property, on the ground that Allen holds it in trust for
him. The case shows that in 1846 Sarah Nix, the mother of John B.
Nix, then a minor residing with her, took possession of the whole
of the northeast quarter of the section. Mrs. Nix had all the legal
qualifications of a preemptor, and while in possession built a
house on the northeast quarter of the quarter section, and cleared
and cultivated a portion of the land on that and on each of the
other quarters of the quarter. The principal part of the clearing
and cultivation, however, was on the quarter where the house
stood.
On the 9th of February, 1853, Congress passed an act granting
lands to the State of Arkansas to aid in building a railroad from a
point on the Mississippi, opposite the mouth of the Ohio, to the
Texas boundary line near Fulton, in Arkansas. 10 Stat. 155. The
lands now in question lie within the limits of that grant, and were
withdrawn from entry on the nineteenth of May, 1853, but the
granting act contained the usual reservation in favor of preemption
settlers.
On the 22d of April, 1853, Mrs. Nix made and filed her
declaratory statement and proof for the preemption of the whole of
the northeast quarter of the section. In her statement she fixed
the first of April, 1853, as the date of her settlement on
Page 112 U. S. 131
the lands. At the time of filing the statement and proof she
made no payment.
On the 27th of March, 1854, Congress passed the following "Act
for the relief of settlers on lands reserved for railroad
purposes." 10 Stat. 269.
"That every settler on public lands which have been or may be
withdrawn from market in consequence of proposed railroads, and who
had settled thereon prior to such withdrawal, shall be entitled to
preemption at the ordinary minimum to the lands settled on and
cultivated by them,
provided, they shall prove up their
rights according to such rules and regulations as may be prescribed
by the Secretary of the Interior, and pay for the same before the
day that may be fixed by the President's proclamation for the
restoration of said lands to market."
On the 31st of March, 1854, Mrs. Nix made a preemption cash
entry of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of the section, and a patent
for this tract was issued in her name under that entry on the 10th
of December, 1874. In her affidavit to support the entry, she fixed
the first of April, 1853, as the date of her settlement, the same
as in her original declaratory statement. It is now claimed that
this entry was not her own act, but the testimony shows
unmistakably that it was. She was feeble at the time and unable to
go to the land office herself, but the business was done for her by
Benjamin Nix, her nephew and the guardian of John B. Nix, who
furnished the money to make the payment from funds in his hands as
guardian. Mrs. Nix had no means of her own, and the fifty dollars
which was required to pay for the forty acres was all that John B.
had. Neither the mother nor the son was able to buy more than was
then entered. On the 28th of September, 1858, Mrs. Nix conveyed the
land she entered to John B., who arrived at full age during the
year 1857.
Mrs. Nix and John B. Nix lived together in the house on the N.E.
1/4 of the quarter section until her death in 1863, and John B.
Remained there down to the time he filed the bill in this case.
While occupying the northeast quarter of the quarter they have used
and cultivated some part of the other quarters,
Page 112 U. S. 132
but the actual residence, both of the mother and son, has always
been on the part that was entered by and patented to the mother.
Mrs. Nix left other heirs besides John B. Nix, some of whom were
living when this suit was begun.
On the 16th of January, 1855, the State of Arkansas transferred
the grant of Congress, so far as it related to the lands in
dispute, to the Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company,
"subject to all the conditions, limitations, and restrictions
contained in the act of Congress aforesaid, and in the act of
Congress entitled 'An act for the relief of settlers on lands
reserved for railroad purposes,' approved March 27, 1854."
The act by which this transfer was made contained the following
provision:
"That citizens or heads of families, being settlers or occupants
previous to the passage of this act on the land herein transferred
to the said Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company, shall each be
entitled to a preference right of entry of any legal subdivision of
land not exceeding one hundred and sixty acres, which shall be upon
such legal subdivision as will include the residence of the said
settler, which preference right shall be at the price of two
dollars and fifty cents per acre, which preference right of entry
shall exist from the passage of this act, and for three months
after notice has been given for three successive weeks in a
newspaper published in the City of Little Rock, that the said land
is in market."
Laws of Ark. 1854-55, p. 150 § 1.
This provision of the act of 1855 was repealed on the 26th of
November, 1856, and the following enacted in its place:
"SEC. 2. Every person who, on the 9th of February, 1853,
occupied, by residence and cultivation thereon, any tract of land
comprised in the grant made by virtue of, and under the provisions
of, such act of Congress of February 9, 1853, may purchase from
said Fulton & Cairo Railroad Company at two dollars and fifty
cents per acre, the legal subdivision of such land as shall include
his residence and actual improvements, not to exceed one quarter
section, by complying with the following conditions:"
"SEC. 3. Such claimant shall, within three months after said
lands are selected and confirmed to said company, and a list or
Page 112 U. S. 133
plat thereof filed in the recorder's office in the county in
which such lands may lie, file with the auditor of state his own
affidavit, accompanied by the affidavits of two disinterested
freeholders of his county, describing the land claimed by legal
subdivisions, proving the fact of such occupancy, residence, and
cultivation upon such legal subdivisions with a view to actual
cultivation and settlement, before the day above specified, said
company may, by giving reasonable notice to such claimant, appear
before the auditor and controvert the facts set forth in such
affidavits, and the auditor may swear witnesses, hear proof, and,
for cause shown, set aside any such claims,
provided that
no such claim shall be set aside for misdescription, or error in
form only, founded on mistake; but on affidavit showing such
mistake, reasonable time may be given for the filing of corrected
proof."
"SEC. 4. Said claimants shall, after three months, or as soon
thereafter as said company shall be in a condition to make title,
pay to said company the consideration for said land as hereinbefore
provided, whereupon he shall be entitled to receive from said
company a deed for the same, but in case of failure to file said
proof, or pay said consideration money within the respective time
specified, the right to make such purchase shall cease."
Laws of Arkansas, 1856, 4.
On the 1st of February, 1859, another act was passed on the same
subject, which contained this provision:
"SEC. 3.
Be it further enacted that every person who,
on the 1st day of November 1858, resided on or cultivated any
improvement on any of the land comprised in the grant made by
virtue of the act of Congress approved February, 9, 1853, may
purchase from the said Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company at two
dollars and fifty cents per acre, one hundred and sixty acres,
which may include the actual residence or the farm of such person,
as he or she chooses to elect, by complying with the conditions
prescribed by an act passed by the last General Assembly of this
state, entitled 'An act to amend an act to aid in the construction
of the Cairo and Fulton Railroad,' approved January 16, 1855, which
act was approved November 26, 1856,
and provided further
that until such default
Page 112 U. S. 134
mentioned in said act, the owners of such improvements shall be
entitled to use and occupy the same free of rent or charges."
Laws of Arkansas 1858-1859, 62.
And, finally, on the 28th of March, 1871, the following was
enacted:
"SECTION 1. That where any settler, who, on or before the eighth
(8th) day of March, 1870, was residing and made improvements on the
lands belonging or claimed by the Cairo and Fulton Railroad
Company, or its branches, shall have the right to purchase the
same, not to exceed one hundred and sixty acres, under the legal
subdivision of said lands, and including the homestead and
improvements of such settler at not exceeding the rate of two
dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per acre, in preference to any and
all other persons, from and after the passage of this act, and for
three (3) months after said land has been advertised according to
law."
"SEC. 2. That any person authorized to purchase land under the
provisions of section one(1) of this act, tender to the authorized
agent of said Cairo and Fulton Railroad Company at the principal
office of said company, or at the principal office of the branches
of said Cairo and Fulton Railroad Company, and to the authorized
agent thereof, the amount of the purchase money of said land, and
demand a title therefor, or his preference right thereto shall be
barred."
Laws of Arkansas 1871, 289, c. 59.
On the 13th of July, 1857, the Commissioner of the General Land
Office certified these lands with others to the Cairo and Fulton
Railroad Company under its grant, and on the 18th of February,
1858, the company filed in the recorder's office of Lafayette
County, which then embraced the lands in dispute, a list of all
lands in that county "selected and confirmed to that company."
On the 15th of April, 1874, the land commissioner of the
railroad company published in the Arkansas Daily Gazette a notice
that the lands of the company between Little Rock and the Texas
line would be sold at the office of the company on and after June
16, 1874, reserving, however, mineral lands and lands through which
the road ran. The road went through
Page 112 U. S. 135
the northeast quarter of this section. The Gazette was a
newspaper published at Little Rock, and designated by the governor
of the state for the publication of official notices, and the
advertisement was continued from the 15th of April to the 15th of
June, 1874. The notice also called on all actual settlers who had
not made application to purchase to do so before the day of sale.
On the 28th of July, 1874, John B. Nix went to the land
commissioner of the company and claimed the right to purchase the
northeast quarter of the section at $2.50 an acre. He at the same
time tendered $400 in payment of the purchase money, and demanded a
conveyance. The commissioner would not admit his right to buy, and
refused his tender.
On the 14th of May, 1875, the company sold and conveyed the
lands in dispute, being the one hundred and twenty acres, to Thomas
Allen the appellee, and on the 23d of the same month he began a
suit against Nix to recover possession.
On the 19th of June, 1878, while this suit was pending, John B.
Nix made application to the land officers of the United States, as
heir at law of Sarah Nix, to purchase the whole northeast quarter
under the preemption claim of his mother. At the same time he
deposited with the register of the land office three hundred
dollars "to pay out his mother's preemption." This application was
refused.
Upon these facts the court below dismissed the bill, and this
appeal was taken from a decree to that effect.
The claim of the appellant is 1, that he has a complete
equitable title to the lands under the acts of Congress as a
preemptor, and 2, that if this fails, the laws of the state gave
him the right to purchase in preference to all others, and that he
fully complied with all the requirements of those laws to complete
and perfect his right of purchase before Allen the appellee, got
title. These will be considered in their order.
1. All the rights of preemption which the appellant sets up
originated with his mother. In his application to enter the lands,
made in 1878, he expressly bases his claim on her original
settlement, and his inheritance from her. He does not pretend that
he made a settlement himself before the rights of
Page 112 U. S. 136
the railroad company accrued. In fact, he could not have made
such a settlement, because he remained a minor until 1857, and the
lands were withdrawn from market in 1853, on account of the
railroad grant. Only persons over the age of twenty-one years could
become preemption settlers. Such is the express provision of the
preemption act. If, then, his mother, had she been alive, could not
have made a preemption entry in 1878, he could not.
The settlement and claim of Mrs. Nix were made under the Act of
September 4, 1841, 5 Stat. 453, and in that statute it was
expressly provided (sec. 10) that "no person shall be entitled to
more than one preemptive right by virtue of this act." When,
therefore, Mrs. Nix, on the 31st of March, 1854, made her
preemption entry of the northeast quarter of the quarter section on
which she settled, and as to which she filed her declaratory
statement in 1853, she, in law, abandoned her settlement on the
other three-quarters of the quarter section for the purpose of
preemption, and surrendered all the preemption rights she ever had
in them. This is clearly shown by the provision in sec. 13, "that
before any person claiming the benefit of this act shall be allowed
to enter such lands," he shall make oath "that he has never had the
benefit of any right of preemption under this act." The right of
preemption is the right to enter lands at the minimum price in
preference to any other person, if all the requirements of the law
are complied with. The prior settlement, declaratory statement, and
proof are not the preemption, but only the means of securing the
right of preemption. By
entering the forty acres in 1854,
Mrs. Nix exhausted the one right of that kind which the law secured
to her, and she could not claim another. She could have entered the
whole 160 acres at the time if she wished to, and had the money,
but such an entry would have required two hundred dollars, and she
had but fifty. The fifty would pay for forty acres, and so she
bought that and gave up the rest. The law made no provision for
entering a part of the quarter section at one time and saving the
right to enter the remainder at another. The averment in the bill
therefore that the payment of the fifty dollars at the time of the
entry of the
Page 112 U. S. 137
forty acres was "intended as a part payment of the whole,"
cannot be true. The law permitted nothing of the kind.
The evident purpose of the Act of March 27, 1854, was to aid
preemptors. It gave the designated settlers the right of preemption
-- that is to say, a preferred right to buy the lands on which they
had settled under the preemption laws at the ordinary minimum
price. If a settler had once had the benefit of those laws, this
statute gave him no new rights. He could not be a preemptor,
because he could not take the necessary oath. Consequently, when
Mrs. Nix, on the 31st of March, four days after the Act of March 27
was approved, made her preemption entry of the forty acres, she
exhausted all her rights under the act of 1854, as well as those
under the act of 1841. It follows that the appellant has no right
under the various acts of Congress which are relied on.
2. The Arkansas act of 1855, giving settlers and occupants a
preference right of purchasing the lands thereby granted to the
railroad company at $2.50 an acre, was repealed by the Act of
November 26, 1856, before either the appellant or his mother
attempted to avail themselves of its provisions. The act of 1856
required claimants to file with the auditor of state certain
affidavits within three months after the lands were selected and
confirmed to the company, and a list and plat thereof filed in the
recorder's office of the county in which the lands were situate.
The list and plat of these lands were filed in the proper
recorder's office on the 13th of July, 1857. No affidavits such as
the act required were ever filed by the appellant or his mother in
the office of the auditor of state, and for this reason, in
accordance with the express provisions of § 4, "the right to make
such purchase" ceased as long ago as the year 1857. The act of 1859
did not inure to the benefit of the appellant or his mother for the
same reason. The privileges of that act could only be secured "by
complying with the conditions prescribed" in the act of 1856.
This reduces the claims of the appellant to such as he has under
the act of 1871. That act grants the privilege of a preference
purchaser only to a
"settler who, on or before the 8th of March, 1870, was residing
and made improvement on the lands
Page 112 U. S. 138
belonging to or claimed by the . . . railroad company,"
which he desired to buy. This appellant, on the 8th of March,
1870,
resided on the northeast quarter of the quarter
section. That land the company neither owned nor claimed. It was
entered and paid for by Mrs. Nix in 1854, and she deeded it to the
appellant in 1858. His title to that part of the quarter section is
not disputed, and his
residence has always been there. He
cultivated parts of the other quarters of the quarter on
the 8th of March, 1870, but he did not
reside upon them or
either of them. Under the circumstances, his residence was, in law,
confined to the land he owned. Seeing this difficulty, he applied
for the purchase of the whole quarter section, basing his claim
apparently on the original settlement and declaratory statement of
his mother for the preemption of that tract. In this way he sought
to connect his residence upon the northeast quarter with his
occupation of the other quarters. That he cannot do, as by the
entry of the northeast quarter his mother separated her residence
from the rest of the quarter section, and he has done nothing since
to change that condition of things. It follows that the appellant
is not entitled to the privileges of the act of 1871, and his
claim, both under the acts of Congress and those of state, has
failed. This makes it unnecessary to consider whether the act of
1871 is constitutional. Good or bad, it is of no use to him. The
same is true of the claim that the company has no title because at
the time the grant was made the land in question was occupied by
Mrs. Nix as a preemptor. The appellant can recover only on the
strength of his own title. If he has no title, it is a matter of no
importance how weak that of his adversary may be.
Decree affirmed.