Monge v. Doehling et al, No. 2:2014cv00684 - Document 14 (E.D. Wis. 2014)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/18/14 granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. Further ordering the Clerk of Court to return to plaintiff the original documents docketed at Docket 1 and Docket 8 10 and that the Clerk of Court terminate plaintiffs other motions and close this case. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm) Modified on 9/19/2014 (jcl)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MANUEL A. MONGE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 14-CV-0684 LORI DOEHLING, CHARLES HUIBREGTSE, ROBERT RHODES JANE/JOHN DOE HSU DEPARTMENT, Defendants, DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Manuel A. Monge, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 on June 12, 2014, along with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion to appoint counsel. Plaintiff also has filed a motion to add party, a motion to change the order in the way the plaintiff is suing the defendants, a motion to subpoena video footage, and a motion for voluntary dismissal. In his motion for voluntary dismissal, plaintiff asks that his claims be dismissed without prejudice so that they may be refiled at a later date. He also asks the court to return to him by mail his complaint and a brief of facts he filed on July 18, 2014. Although plaintiff has already paid his initial partial filing fee and this case is ready for screening, I will grant plaintiff s motion for voluntary dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff s motion for voluntary dismissal (Docket #13) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall return to plaintiff by mail the original documents docketed at Docket #1 and Docket #10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court terminate plaintiff s other motions and close this case. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 18th day of September, 2014. s/ Lynn Adelman _______________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
