Kartman v. Markle et al, No. 5:2010cv00106 - Document 155 (N.D.W. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 106 , DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPEAL 107 , DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 108 , GRANTING AS FRAMED MOTION 110 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NTERROGAT ORIES, DENYING LETTER MOTION 115 TO RULE ON PENDING MOTIONS, GRANTING MOTION 120 FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES, DENYING MOTION 124 FOR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, DENYING MOTION 126 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INTERROGATORIES, DENYING MOTION 127 F OR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, DENYING MOTION 132 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING MOTION 137 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, GRANTING 143 MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND DENYING following Defendant's Motions in Li mine: 148 Motion in Limine; 149 Motion in Limine; 150 Motion in Limine; 151 Motion in Limine; 152 Motion in Limine; 153 Motion in Limine; 154 Motion in Limine. Court vacates generally the current trial date. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/5/12. (c to plaintiff by cert mail)(cc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/5/2012: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cc).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.