USA v. Milner, et al, No. 2:2001cv00809 - Document 339 (W.D. Wash. 2005)

Court Description: ORDER granting 337 Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Judgment is WITHDRAWN. Clerk is to file Final Judgment as EXPRESSLY ORDERED only as to the Government's claims against the Nicholsons. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN, )

Download PDF
USA v. Milner, et al Doc. 339 Case 2:01-cv-00809-RBL Document 339 1 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 1 of 3 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on its own behalf and as trustee on behalf of the Lummi Nation, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 11 12 13 14 15 v. Case No. C01-0809 RBL ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND ORDERING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b) KEITH E. MILNER and SHIRLEY A. MILNER, Defendants. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on its own behalf and as trustee on behalf of the Lummi Nation, Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 MARY D. SHARP, 19 Defendant. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on its own behalf and as trustee on behalf of the Lummi Nation, 20 21 Plaintiff, 22 v. 23 24 BRENT C. NICHOLSON and MARY K. NICHOLSON, 25 Defendants. ____________________________________ 26 27 28 ORDER Page - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:01-cv-00809-RBL 1 2 Document 339 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 2 of 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on its own behalf and as trustee on behalf of the Lummi Nation, 3 Plaintiffs, 4 v. 5 HARRY F. CASE, 6 Defendant. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on its own behalf and as trustee on behalf of the Lummi Nation, 7 8 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 IAN C. BENNETT and MARCIA A. BOYD, 12 Defendants. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on its own behalf and as trustee on behalf of the Lummi Nation, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 v. DONALD C. WALKER and GLORIA WALKER, Defendants. ____________________________________ THE LUMMI NATION, Intervenor-Plaintiff. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter is before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Set Aside the Judgment [Dkt. # 337] entered by the Clerk of the Court on April 25, 2005 [ Dkt. # 327]. As the Government correctly points out, the Court’s Order of April 20 [Dkt. #326] (upon which the Judgment is based) did not purport to, and did not, resolve all issues among all parties before the court in this action. The Defendants do not dispute this. The Court’s Order was not a Final Order and the Judgement [Dkt. #327] was entered erroneously. It is therefore WITHDRAWN. ORDER Page - 2 Case 2:01-cv-00809-RBL 1 Document 339 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 3 of 3 However, it is apparent (and neither party disputes) that the issues adjudicated by the April 20 2 Order (relating to the Nicholsons’ violation of the Clean Water Act) are readily severable from the 3 remaining claims against the remaining defendants. The Government has indicated that it is moving toward 4 resolution of its claims against the other defendants, but to date no resolution has been announced to the 5 court. There is no reason for the Nicholsons to await some future resolution of those claims while the 6 various Orders affecting their use of their property are in place, and while they are in fact paying some 7 rental as a condition of keeping their defense structure in place. The court therefore EXPRESSLY FINDS 8 that there is no just reason for delaying entry of a Final Judgment as to the Government’s claims against the 9 Nicholsons, and EXPRESSLY ORDERS that such a judgment be entered by the Clerk. 10 11 Dated this 6th day of June, 2005. A 12 13 RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Page - 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.