Coleman v. Danville Police Department et al, No. 7:2018cv00018 - Document 38 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 6/26/2018. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
cu f sogt ua w% ee> eG' /c: j A D N I kV T A v( A L FI LED J 2r 2 1 UN 28 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R T H E W ESTERN D I STR I O F W R G I I CT N A R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI JO SH UA M A LI C O LEM AN , K Pl nt f , ai i f JUL BK . DU , * FRK TI . . . D Ci lA c i n N o.7: c 0001 vi t o 18- v8 M EM O R AND U M O PI IO N N D A NV ILLE PO LICE D EPA R TM EN T,e al, t . D ef endant s. By: H on.Jaclson L .K i k ser Se or U nie St t sD i t i tJudge ni td a e src J huaM alk Col m a a V igi a pr s rpr e ng pr K , ie acvi rg saci n os i e n, r ni i one oce di o fld i l i ht to . purua t 42U. C.j1983, f ngt Commo alh' Ator y-o t CiyofDa le s nt o t S. nani he nwe t s l ne f r he t nvil, t D a le Polc D e r m e ,a polc o f c r asde e n s. D e e nt fl m o i nst he nvil i e pa t nt nd i e f i e s f nda t f nda s ied t o o di m i s a a t r e c m oton,t Cl r i s d a N otc t ta s Pl i ift t m o i ns s s , nd fe a h i he e k s ue i e ha dvi ed a ntf hat he t o hadbe n fl d a t tPl i ifha t nt oneda fom e c m o i t fl ar s e ie nd ha antf d we yys r a h ton o ie e pons . The e N otc f rhe a s d: i es u t r dvi e l Pl i i f doe no r s f a ntf s t e pond t D e e nt s pl a ngs t Cour w il a s e t t o f nda ' e di , he t l s um ha Pl i if has l t i e e t i t c s , a or t t Pl n if a e w ih wha t a ntf os nt r s n he a e nd/ ha ai t f gr es t t he Dee nt sae i t i giq r po i pla ngt) I Pl nif wihe t fnda tts n her sc es nsve e di s. f aitf s s o c tnue w ih t c e, i i ne s a y t t Pl i if r s nd i a a o i t on i t he as t s ce s r ha a ntf e po n n ppr pr a e f hi n .... H ow e r i Pl ntf does no fl s e r s ns w ihi t t e vas o ve , f ai i f t i e om e po e t n he w nt o ( )da pe i t Cour m a d s ist c e f rf itr t pr e ut ne 21 y rode he t y im s he as o alle o os c e. No ie( No . 8 3 )( rgn le h ss.S bsq n l s vea d fn a t as flda tc ECF s 2 , 6 o ii a mp a i) u e ue ty, r rl ee d n s lo i e m oto t di m i sf l c ofpr e uton. i n o s s or a k os c i Pl i ifdi no r s antf d t e pond t t N o i sort t m o i ns a t No i swe eno o he tce o he to , nd he tce r t Coleman v. Danville Police Department et al Doc. 38 r t r d t t c t unde i r bl . Plr ua t t N otc a t m o i t dim i s f rl c e u ne o he our as lve a e z s nt o he i es nd he ton o s s o a k ofpr ec i n,1fnd t tPl ntf ha f ie t pr e ut t sc e A c or ngl t co pl nt os uto i ha ai i f s a l d o os c e hi as . c di y, he m ai i dimisdwiho prj c f Pli ifsf itr t pr e ut,plrua tt Fe R.Ci P. s s se t ut eudie or antf alle o os c e zs n o d. v. Dockets.Justia.com 41b , nda1 n igmoinsa ed n e wi o t rj d c a mo t Se Li kv. a a hR. ( ) a 1pe dn to r e id t u p eu ie s o . e n W b s R. h Co, 70U.. 2 , 3 - 1( 9 2 (Thea t rt o ac u tod s s s as o t f rlc o .3 S 6 6 6 03 1 6 ) i uhoiy f o r t imis u p n e o a k f pr ec i n ha ge r ly be n co i r d a (r r ntpo r'... c s rl ve td i c t os uto s ne al e nsde e n il e he we , ne es a iy se n ours t ma a et i o af i s a t a h e et eo d ry a de p dto d s sto o c s s' o n g her wn far o s o c iv h r el n x e i us ipo iin f a e . i ). ENTER : s Thif ' y ofJme, da t 2018. A . S ni Unie SttsbititJ ge or td ae src ud
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
