Hammer v. Hutcheson, No. 7:2016cv00517 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 11/15/2016. (tvt)

Download PDF

tk Nl e: 1 B' :1% QY RT K e @e: Q' @ AT7AN I , 5 VI 9 AE . N2 l5 2 1 V 26 I THE UM TED STATES DI N STRI COURT CT FO R T H E W ESTERN D I STRI T O F W R G I I C N A R O AN OK E DI SI N W O FIED L J UL BY; . LE GLERK D M . D GREGORY LEON H AM M ER, Pett oner, ii C i lA c i N o.7: c 00517 vi ton 16- v- V. M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI SHEW FF BRYAN HUTCHESON, By: c R es pondent . H on. ks L.Kie Jac on sr Se or Uni e St e D i t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c Gr or Le Hn e ,aVigi apr ra de aneepr e ng pr K ,Gl d ape ii f eg y on mm r r ni eti l t i oc edi o e tton or am i ofha a c pus Pe iine c t be s or . tto r ompli t tt Roccnghn Cot y Cic tCout wilnot ans ha he li m mt r ui t l r las Pe ii ro bond a trhi a r s f a lgedl pos es i a c nc ald we po ee e ttone n fe s re t or le y s sng o e e a n t a ul a whie apr ton de ane r ma nspe ng. The sae cr ui co tde e t ml wf ly nd l oba i ti r e i ndi t t ic t ur ni d he r que tf bai,and Peii ra ald t t Cour ofAppe l ofVigi a. e s or l ttone ppe e o he t as r ni A f r lc t l onl i r it a saeco tsdee mi ton ofba lwhe t ede a our wil y nquie n o tt ur? tr na i i n he dee mi ton i abir r ordic i i t r orr s t i t de a ofc tr na i s r ta y s rm na o y e uls n he ni l ouns lo af i til e r ar ra . M atinv. dma 326F. 708,71 11( hCi.1 4) W a lvv.W ikes n, F. sra He n, 2d 0- 8t r 96 ; nse l ro 263 Supp. 5 , 6 5 ( . Va 1 6 ) t ep po eo rq iigab n i t a slet prs n eo t e 4 5 - 7 W D. . 9 7 . Th u s f e urn o d s o st he e e c f h r d fn a ta t etil I tetilu g r a o a l beive t a r g r ls o t n u tst h ee d n t h ra. f h ra j d e e s n by l s h t e ad e s f he mo n e t e e a c s dwil t i l t bep e e ta tilhema d n balc mp eey Alo atilud e c u e lbe ml y o rs n tra, ke y e y i o ltl. s , ra j g m us de bali hef el t r l s oft a c e wile ngert s et oft c t ny i f e s he eea e he c us d l nda he af y he omm u lt ' riy. ' W a lv s p a a 5 (n ena ctto so te ) nse , u r , t 7 itr l i in mitd . a Hammer v. Hutcheson Doc. 2 Peii rf ist e t bls t tt de a ô balwasa bir r ordic i naor or ttone al o sa ih ha he nil f i r ta y s rmi t y r s t i t de lalofco elora f i ti l Furhe m o e a e e r r na y c r t l t nc s e uled n he zi uns a r r a . t r r , bs nt xtao di r i c m s a e , f de alc t mus noti e f r wih pe ng sae c i i lpr e ngs See e. ,Yo e v. e r ours t nt re e t ndi t t rm na oc edi . . a. mm r Ha s 40 U. 3 , 4( 9 ) Hal a e v W a lv 1 2U. 1 , 6 - ( 8 8 ; yo v. ni , 1 S. 7 4 1 71 ; rc d r . de , 7 S. 48 1 970 1 9 ) Ta lr r Dockets.Justia.com Tano ,8 U. 3 6 3 0( 8 3 .Fe ea dsrc c u t s ul a sanfo c n ttto a it r 3 S. 6 , 7 1 7 ) d rl itit o rs ho d b ti r m o siuin l c aln e t saej dca p o e dn s r g r ls o acam' meis i t fd r l li c u d h le g s o tt u iil r c e ig , e ad e s f li s rt,f he e ea cams o l b p e e tdi t o g i saej dca p o e dng Ci maBleo Ch ro t. n . e rs n e n he n ong tt u iil r c e i . ne u f a lte l c v. Gic rs, 8 F.d49 5 - 3(t Ci. 98 ) Clal, t ine ma p e e tl scamst sae lh it 8 7 2 , 2 5 4h r 1 9 . e ry Pei o r y r s n a li o tt t i c rsvi a alt Vigi aco t. Se Bo me v. r ui Co tofSt Loui,526 F. 1331, ou t a ppe o r ni urs e r r Cic t ur . s 2d 1 3 (t Ci. 9 )(q b n )(co g e sa t ef d r lc ursha ec nsse tyr c n z d 3 6 8h r 1 75 q a c t n rs nd h e ea o t v o itnl e og le d t tf de alc u' s dpe tsa ec t t ty sa ec s s a t t whe e c ngiutona ha e r ot t houl nni t t ours o r t t a e , nd ha, r o tt i l s is e a ie saec u tu g saef l c mp tn t ha l t e s be t oS p e Co r su s rs , tt o rj d e r ul o ee t o nde h m u j c t u rme u t y rve ' .Mo e ve,heAn iljmcinAc, 8U.. j2 8 , x r sl p o iisac u t e iw.) r o r t ' t-nt to t 2 SC. 2 3 e p e sy r hbt o r fo e j ii saeci n l r c e n s a d1lc u d cint g a t n n r l f rm n onng tt rmia p o e dig , n a kj ds ito o r n ma d mus ei e a i tsa eof i l ors aeage i s Gtreyv.Supei Cour ofM e kl nblr Cnt ,411 gans t t fc a s tt nc e . ll lor t c e zg y. - F.d 5 6, 8 (t Ci. 9 9 . 2 8 5 7 4h r 1 6 ) Ac o dngy t peiin i ds se wi o t rj dc , t s a tt Ruls1b a d4o c r i l,he tto s imis d t u p eu ie jl u n o e ( ) n f h r t Rue Go e nng92 5 Ca e , e a eip anya pe r fo t ep tto ta Peiin ri he ls v r i 2 4 s s b c us t lil p as r m h eiin h t tto e s note il t r le .Ba e u m y fndi t tPe ii rha notm a t r quiie ntted o e if s d pon i ng ha ttone s de he e st s b tn ils wi o ad n a o ac nsi in l ih a rq ie b 2 U. C. 2 3()a d u sa ta ho ng f e il f o tmto a rg t s e ur d y 8 S. j 25 c n Sl kv.M c ' ,529U. 473, 4 ( ) ac ri aeofa aa lt i dele ac Dnnl el S. 48 2000 , e tsc t ppe lbiiy s zid. ENTER:Tli ls - da ofN o mbe , 6. . y ve r 201 sçïo Unie sttsDititJ ge zlr td ae src ud 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.