Branham v. Parker et al, No. 7:2015cv00351 - Document 31 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 6/29/2016. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
v K w oplgu.: e Wk q : pe *% bi A n N k ,A T A Mliv Fl uEn J 29 2 1 UN 25 . I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O AN O K E D I SI N VI O WI LBY JAM ES BR ANHAM , Pl ntf , ai if ' V. M AJOR PARKER e aI, t . Dee f ndant . s ) ) ' ) ) ) ) ) JUL DU W BY: . DE c C i lA c i N o.7: - vvi ton 15 c 00351 M EM O M N DU M O PI O N M By: H o Jac on L . i e n. ks K sr Se or U nied St e Di t i tJudge ni t at s s r c W iby J m e Br nhn ,aVigi aprs rpr ee ng pr # ,fld a cvi rght a ton l a s n m r ni ione oc di o q ie i l i s ci - p ru n t 4 U. C. 1 8 nn ngt eBleRig J i (7a1)a d i s4fa de e a t.On u s a t o 2 S. j 9 3 mi h u d e al : i' n t tf s fnd ns ' s M a 1 , 1 , e e d n sfldamo inf rsz l j dg n .Ont n x d y t eClr y 8 20 6 d fn a t ie to o l ' u me t mmay he e t a ,h ek ' is e aNo iet a a v sdPlitf t a amo inf rsl r ud me twa lldo M a 1 , su d tc h t d ie an if h t to o l mmayj g n $ ie n y 8 2016,a t tPli ifhadt nt oneda fom t No i et fl a r s nd ha antf we yys r he tc o ie e pons . TheNotc e ie f rhe a s u t r dvied: fpl i i t es o f ntslpl di s he I antg doesno r pond t oebnda - :l ea ng , t coux wila s t t l s ume ha Pl i if has l t i e e t i t c e a / r t t Pl ntf a e * 1, w ha t a ntf os nt r s n he as , nd o ha ai i f gr es 1 1 t he De e d n sae i ter Eiq r s nsve pla i t) l Plit f wih s t f n a t tt s n h i sc epo i e dng s. f ani s e o f c i wih t c e, i i ne e s y t t Pli if r s ontnue t he as t s c s ar ha antf e pond i a a o it n n ppr pra e f s on .... Howe r i Pl i ifdoe hotfl s er s ns wihi t t nt a hi ve s f antf s ie om e po e t n he we vone( )da pe i t Coul m a dimist ca ef f ilr t pr ec t 21 y rod. he ' y s s he s or a lze o os u e. t ' No ie( no 3 )( rgna e h ss. tc ECF . 0 o ii l mp a i) P an ifd dn tr s o dt t eNoieo temoinf rs mmayj d me ta t e litf i o e p n o h tc r h to o l r u g n , nd h z N o i wa no r tm ld t t co ta t lve a e ls ntt t N o i e er d on M a 1 tce s t e t e o he ur s mdei r bl .Ptr ua o he tce nt e y 9, Branham v. Parker et al Doc. 31 201 1fnd t tPl ntf ha f ie t pr e ut t sca e. A c or ngl t c pl i i 6, i ha ai i f s a l d o os c e hi s c di y, he om a nt s d s se wi u p eudc frPlitf f i r t p o e u e p rua t oF d R. v P. 09, imis d t t rj ie o an ifs al e o r s c t, u s n t e . Ci. 41 ho u a a1 e igmo in aed ne wi u p eudc a mo t S eLikv. a a hR. Co, nd 1p ndn to s r e id t t rj ie s o . e r W b s R. . ho l l noeta al e iigd fn a t fldtemoinf rsmmayj d me t I t h t lrmann ee d ns i h to o u r u g n . e Dockets.Justia.com RK K 3 0U. 6 6 6 0 31( 9 2 (% a t rt o ac u t od s s s as o t f rlc o 7 S. 2 , 3 - 1 6 ) ( The uho i f o r t imis u p n e o a k f y pr e ton hasg ne a l bee c i r d a çnhe e tpowe , ... e s iyvese i c rs os cu i e r ly n onsde e n i r n r' nec s arl t d n ou t t ma a etero af iss a t a h e et o d ry a e p dto d s o iino c ss' o n g h i wn far o s o c iv he r el nd x e iius ip sto f a e . ). EN TER : Th' da JfJ m e 201 y t , 6. . ' Se rUried St t D ti tJ n' lt aqs l c udge P
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
