Donohue v. Lambert et al, No. 7:2013cv00397 - Document 19 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/04/2013. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
hi lf He a s f a sofk e swilc nc ot ri aest tlo f eson hi . One oft s ie. lo e r t r l onvi e he nm t o lr w ec m he d fn a t h salg dy s i h i û ing f rt epefc tmet srke a ans ( n h e . ee d n s a le e l ad e s t t o h re t i o ti g i t Do o u l' wa i ' Anot de e ntal ge y t d Donohue i M a 201 t ti hec r d hi w i her f nda le dl ol n y 3 ha f ove e s ndow,hewoul d r c ve a dicplna y c r e a be plc on srp ce lsa us Donohue c am s t t ot r e ei s i i r ha g nd a ed ti l tt . l i ha he i aeswho c rt i wi w sa eno c r d orpl e on srp c l nm t ove her ndo r t ha ge ac d ti el. The cour c nno tnd t t t a tona f c s pr de i Donohue' m o i f t a t s ha he ddii l a t ovi d n s ton or rc nsd rto rq r ad fee to to o hi rq e tf ritroc tr ij ci er l f Hi e o ie ai n e uie ifrn uc me n s e u s o n el uo y nun tv ei e s f a sa ie fom hea s y evi nc a hi own it r e a i ofe nt and c me s r t rt n e r rs r ra de e nd s n e pr t ton ve s om nt , ahe ha fom any r ale de e t tofi e sa e lkey t ha m hi i e i nal ort ca e i a e t r e vi nc ha fc r r i l o r m nt nto ly o us nm t s o ha m hi . M or ove ,i Donohue f r ha m fom ot ri es he ma tke a opra e se r m e r f ea s r ' r he nmat , y a ppr it t ps unde t prs a i sr tve r di spr e est r que tpr e tve cusody. I a ton, r he ion dm nita i eme e oc dur o e s ot c i t n ddii net rDonohue' f a ofbengdicplne agan f vi a i prs r l snort a lged ve bal ihe s er i s i i d i or oltng ion u e he le r t ea sofk e s ha m a i s t i ntt s k t t r ve de s ufk e o uppor a fndi t tDonohue i i i m i ntdange t i ng ha s n m ne r hes e ons he of ir pa abl ha m s as t wa r n t e r r na y r le he s eks1 Fort e r as , t re r e r o o r a t he xtao di r ei f e . c twilde Donohue' m otont r consde . a opra eor w ilis t sda our l ny s i o e i r An ppr it der l s ue hi y. The Clr i die t d t s nd c es oft s me o a z opi on and a compa ng ek s rce o e opi hi m r ndlm ni c nyi or rt pli if de o antf . Ex TER : 'hi r s V dyo oco e, 2013. a f tbr Chi Unied Sit Diti tJ e ef t es src udg 1 Se Rea TruhAboutOba . lc v F , 5F.d3 2 3 (t Ci. 0 9 , a ae o oh rgo n s ma n . . EC 57 3 4 y 46 4h r 2 0 ) v ctd n te ru d , e l t 5 9U. 1 8 (01 ) risae i rlv n p r b 6 7F.d35 ,3 5(t Ci. 0 (q oig Witrv. tr l 5 S. 0 9 2 0 ,enttd n ee a t at y 0 3 5 5 4h r 201 ) tu t n ne Naua Re o re Dee s Co n i l c,5 5U..7 2 (0 8)(i ig t tameeR siii 'o i e aa l h r i su c s fn e u cl n . 5 S , 0 2 0 ) f n ha . nd r po sbly' f r p rbe am s t r lnc n itn wi ( lc aa trz to o ij n tv rl fa a e ta r iayrme y ta ma o ybea r e ç o sse t t t h rceiain f nu cie ei s n xro dn r e d h t y nl i h he e wad d u nace rs o n ta t panifse t ldt sc rleM) po la h wig h the litf i nie o u h eit . t
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
