Jones v. Zych, No. 7:2012cv00496 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 11/26/2012. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OFFI U. DI COUW S CE S. ST. ., pj. ,$j .. j, , . v. , ). . , A N0V 26 2 1 22 I T H E U N I ED ST AT ES D ISTR I T C O U R T N T C FO R T H E W ESTER N D I R I O F V I G I I ST CT R N A R O A N O K E D IV ISIO N T O N Y LA M O N T JO N ES, JUL, . , . .' ERK . . . ', ' BK C Ci lA c i N o.7: 2c vi t on 1 v00496 Petii t oner, 2241 M EM O M N D UM O PIN I N O W A RD EN C .ZY CH , R espondent. By:Sam ue G .W is l l on U ni ed States Di t ctJudge t s ri Thi i apeii byTony La s s tton montJ spu s ntt 28U. C.j2241cli ngt tt one rua o S. ami ha he U nie St t s Penienta y i Le Count des t J ne 'r pe t d r ue t ,hasf ie t co r t td ae t ir n e y, pie o s e a e eq s s a l d o r ec hi i tt tonalr co ds whi h haspr ve edhi r las fo c t s nsiu i e r , c e nt s ee e r m usody. I 1 n 997,t Unie he t d St t sD i ti tCour f t Ea t n Di t i tofV igi a s nt nce J s t t o conc r ntlf a e sr c t or he s er s rc r ni e e d one o w ur e ie s n e s J pr pa ed a t nsnz t' nt a oun of$8, 628.2, c hec am st e t nce . ones e r n s t men 'i he m t i 202, 0 whi h l i o ha m a l d t t Cl r oft U nie St t sD i ti tCo tf rt Ea t r Di t i tofVi gi a. ve ie o he e k he t d a e sr c ur o he s e n s rc r ni J oness e st be i ve t tt si t um e ha t ef e tofca elng hi s nt e. U nlket e m o le ha hi nsr nt d he f c nc i s e enc i he i t um e J ns r nt onespr vi l pr pa ed,J e ous y e r onesac ualy pa d fve dola si Unied St t c r ncy t l i i lr n t a es ur e a hi flng f i t sc e. Appa e l J s notunlket ofi i sa hi i tt i i s s ii ee n hi as r nty, one , i he fcal t s nsiuton, s s ptc a ke i al boutt ef i c ofhi fna a i t um e s l any e nt J s ha notsa e a he fca y s i nci l ns r nt . n ve , one s tt d pl us bl c ai t r le ,a t c t s i s hi pe ii a i e l m o e i f nd he our dim s es s tton. . ENTER : ove be 26, 2012. N m r -. ' . - 7 v....x- ,' ' . s.' G I STATESDI CT J TED STRI UDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.